Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: GNSO CSG Work Team Call Friday 05 Feb

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Julie for the reminder.
Looking forward to talking to you on Friday.
Regards
Olga

2010/2/3 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

>  Dear Work Team members,
>
> In preparation for our call this Friday I have compiled the proposed
> changes to the text for Task 1, Subtask 1 below in order by section.  These
> also are on the wiki document page at:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1.
>  As these are proposed changes they are shown on the wiki in curly brackets.
>  Here also is the link to the wiki page for Task 1, Subtask 2:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2
> .
>
> *Please note that our call on Friday, 05 February 2010, begins at 13:00
> UTC, which is 1 hour earlier than the usual time and the duration will be
> 90 minutes.
>
> *Thanks and I’ll look forward to talking to you on Friday.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
> *
> ----------------------------
> *From ICANN Legal Staff on 02 February for Section 2f:
>
> “We consulted with John, and agree that the proper  reference here is to
> the Office of the Ombudsman.  The Ombudsman is a  neutral and has
> jurisdiction over allegations of unfair treatment by ICANN  constituent
> bodies.   I recommend that to facilitate this, the  language of the
> recommendation be changed to:
>
>
> “f.     In case of *unfair treatment resulting in the  *rejection of an
> application or a dispute, the applicant *may lodge a  complaint with the
> ICANN Ombudsman.  The process for lodging a complaint  with the Ombudsman is
> set forth in Article V of the ICANN Bylaws and in the  Ombudsman Framework,
> available at
> http://www.icann.org/ombudsman/documents/ombudsman-framework-26mar09-en.pdf.
>  “
>
> *Original language: “f. In  case of rejection of an application or a
> dispute, the applicant shall have  recourse of appeal to a neutral third
> party. The GROUP shall SELECT such a  neutral third party in consultation
> with ICANN/GNSO {???}.”
> *
> -----------------------------
> *From Claudio diGangi on 29 January for Section 3:
>
> I proposed the following edit to better flush out and clarify this
> recommendation.
>
> please see below in CAPS for additions
>
> THERE SHOULD BE EMPHASIS ON CONSENSUS BUILDING IN GROUP DELIBERATIONS.
> GROUPs SHOULD REFER to the GNSO WG model. The use of voting WITHIN POLICY
> DELIBERATIONS should be minimized as much as possible.
>
> WHATEVER CONSENSUS BUILDING MODEL OR PROCESS A GROUP USES, THE GROUP MUST
> DESCRIBE THE PROCESS IN THEIR BYLAWS OR CHARTER SO IT IS VISIBLE AND
> TRANSPARENT.
>