ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Action Item: Task 1, Subtask 1 Section 2f -- Response from ICANN Legal

  • To: <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>, <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Action Item: Task 1, Subtask 1 Section 2f -- Response from ICANN Legal
  • From: "Papac, Krista" <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:38:12 -0500

All,

I apologize for the late notice but I had something come up and cannot make 
todays call. 

Krista

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx> 
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>; gnso-osc-csg 
<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Thu Feb 04 13:51:43 2010
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Action Item: Task 1, Subtask 1 Section 2f -- 
Response from ICANN Legal 



Thanks Julie. I’m happy with that. Saves lots of effort all round to use an 
existing procedure. 

 

Very best,  

 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 



 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication. 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 03 February 2010 15:48
To: gnso-osc-csg
Cc: Robert Hoggarth
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Action Item: Task 1, Subtask 1 Section 2f -- Response 
from ICANN Legal

 

Dear Work Team members,

With respect to Action Item 1 from last Friday’s call, we have consulted with 
ICANN legal staff seeking guidance concerning the language for Section 2 
paragraph f and have received a response and suggested language from Dan 
Halloran and Samantha Eisner.  

Here is the original language:

“f. In case of rejection of an application or a dispute, the applicant shall 
have recourse of appeal to a neutral third party. The GROUP shall SELECT such a 
neutral third party in consultation with ICANN/GNSO {???}.”

Here is Samantha’s response:
---------------- begin response ------------------------
“We consulted with John, and agree that the proper reference here is to the 
Office of the Ombudsman.  The Ombudsman is a neutral and has jurisdiction over 
allegations of unfair treatment by ICANN constituent bodies.   I recommend that 
to facilitate this, the language of the recommendation be changed to:

“f.    In case of unfair treatment resulting in the rejection of an application 
or a dispute, the applicant may lodge a complaint with the ICANN Ombudsman.  
The process for lodging a complaint with the Ombudsman is set forth in Article 
V of the ICANN Bylaws and in the Ombudsman Framework, available at 
http://www.icann.org/ombudsman/documents/ombudsman-framework-26mar09-en.pdf. “
---------------- end response -----------------

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Julie 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4832 (20100203) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4836 (20100204) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


The information contained in this email message and its attachments
is intended
only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission
of email over the Internet
 is not a secure communications medium. If you are requesting or
have requested
the transmittal of personal data, as defined in applicable privacy
laws by means
 of email or in an attachment to email you must select a more
secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient and/or you have received this
email in error, you must take no action based on the information in
this email and you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
misuse, copying, or disclosure of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email
and delete the original message.

JPEG image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy