RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Comments for Today's Meeting

[<HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I apologize for missing the call today.  Our offices have been closed
all week and today our offices reopened.  I have been pulled in five
different directions at once this morning. 

Debbie 

 

Debra Y. Hughes l Senior Counsel 
American Red Cross 

Office of the General Counsel  
2025 E Street, NW 
Washington, D.C. 20006 
Phone: (202) 303-5356 
Fax: (202) 303-0143 
HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:50 AM
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Comments for Today's Meeting

 

Dear Work Team members,

Here are the comments received for consideration during today's meeting.
See also the document wiki links:  Subtask 1:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_
operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1 and Subtask 2:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_g
roup_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2.

Thanks,

Julie

>From Rafik, 10 February:

2.f
IN THE CASE OF REJECTION OF AN APPLICATION OR A DISPUTE IN CONNECTION
WITH AN APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MAY LODGE A COMPLAINT WITH THE ICANN
OMBUDSMAN [IF THE GROUP ACCEPT AND VALID OMBUDSMAN AS NEUTRAL AND NO
BIASED THIRD PARTY]. THE PROCESS FOR LODGING A COMPLAINT WITH THE
OMBUDSMAN IS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE V OF THE ICANN BYLAWS AND IN THE
OMBUDSMAN FRAMEWORK, AVAILABLE AT
http://www.icann.org/ombudsman/documents/ombudsman-framework-26mar09-en.
pdf.

>From Victoria, 10 February:

2.f
IN THE CASE OF REJECTION OF AN APPLICATION OR A DISPUTE IN CONNECTION
WITH AN APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT MAY LODGE A COMPLAINT WITH THE ICANN
OMBUDSMAN. THE PROCESS FOR LODGING A COMPLAINT WITH THE OMBUDSMAN IS SET
FORTH IN ARTICLE V OF THE ICANN BYLAWS AND IN THE OMBUDSMAN FRAMEWORK,
AVAILABLE AT
http://www.icann.org/ombudsman/documents/ombudsman-framework-26mar09-en.
pdf.
 
3. PARA 2
IT IS RECOMMENDED GROUPS SHOULD FUNCTION ON THE GNSO WG MODEL FOR THE
PURPOSES OF REACHING CONSENSUS AND THE USE OF VOTING SHOULD BE MINIMISED
AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.  (NB this was the original text which we agreed
prior to Claudio's new version). 
 
As to Subtask 1.2 -I have no comments as to the edits so far. 
 
As to 1.5 -this is self explanatory and a formal, written and
transparent method of communicating from Chair to Chair is recommended
in future.