<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 12 February Meeting
- To: gnso-osc-csg <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 12 February Meeting
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:09:19 -0800
Dear Work Team members,
Here are the actions/summary from Friday’s meeting. Our next meeting will be
held next Friday, 19 February at 1300 UTC/0500 PST/0800 EST and is scheduled
for 90 minutes. Note that the Work Team agreed to revisit the time in a
discussion at the next meeting. The actions and summary are included on the
wiki at: https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
Changes to the Task 1, Subtask 1 document are on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1
and the Task 1, Subtask 2 document at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2.
Changes are shown in ALL CAPS, strikeout, and curly brackets. Thank you very
much.
Best regards,
Julie
Actions/Summary:
1. Task 1, Subtask 1: There was discussion on Section 2, paragraph f. Work
Team members suggested new language based on changes suggested by Rafik, with
some modifications. In addition, Claudio suggested alternate language for
Section 3, paragraph 2 during the meeting. Work Team members are requested to
comment on the list on the following suggested changes:
Section 2, para. f: "IN CASE OF UNFAIR TREATMENT RESULTING IN THE REJECTION OF
AN APPLICATION OR A DISPUTE, THE APPLICANT MAY LODGE A COMPLAINT WITH THE ICANN
OMBUDSMAN {OR A MUTUALLY AGREED UPON NON-BIASED NEUTRAL THIRD PARTY}. THE
PROCESS FOR LODGING A COMPLAINT WITH THE OMBUDSMAN IS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE V OF
THE ICANN BYLAWS AND IN THE OMBUDSMAN FRAMEWORK, AVAILABLE AT
http://www.icann.org/ombudsman/documents/ombudsman-framework-26mar09-en.pdf".
Section 3, para. 2: "{TO IMPROVE ACCESSIBILITY, TRANSPARENCY, AND
ACCOUNTABILITY, ALL GROUPS SHOULD ESTABLISH AND PUBLISH A CONSENSUS BUILDING
MODEL OR PROCESS IN THEIR BYLAWS OR CHARTER. THE PROCESS OR MODEL SHOULD BE
BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES OF PARTICIPATION, REPRESENTATIVENESS, PROCESS
INTEGRITY, FLEXIBILITY, TRANSPARENCY, OPENNESS, AND OTHER NORMS COMMON TO THE
GNSO WG MODEL}. t{T}he use of voting {WITHIN POLICY DELIBERATIONS} should be
minimized as much as possible." 7
2. Task 1, Subtask 2: The Work Team discussed Subtask 2 through Part II,
Section 4 Elections.
--Work Team members: review the changes (in ALL CAPS and curly brackets {}) on
the Wiki Page noted above.
--Section 1.5 Process Issues: Discuss further with Victoria on 19 February.
--Claudio: Review Section 2 Committees, paragraphs c and d.
--Section 3 Communications, para. b: (1) Michael: check the Registries
Stakeholder Group Charter; (2) Julie: check the BGC recommendations, and also
with respect to paragraphs c-f re: Constituency Disclosure Policy.
--Section 4 Elections, para. b: Claudio: review the language.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|