Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 12 February Meeting

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Work Team members,
I hope this email finds you well.
In preparation for our conference call tomorrow, review please the action
items detailed by Julie in her email (Thanks Julie!) and send your comments
/ text.
Please review the changes in the documents uploded in the wiki and send
comments to the list or during the call, if needed.
Looking forward to talking to you tomorrow.
Regards
Olga


2010/2/15 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

>  Dear Work Team members,
>
> Here are the actions/summary from Friday’s meeting.  Our next meeting will
> be held n*ext Friday, 19 February at 1300 UTC/0500 PST/0800 EST and is
> scheduled for 90 minutes.*  Note that the Work Team agreed to revisit the
> time in a discussion at the next meeting.  The actions and summary are
> included on the wiki at: *
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team*.
>  Changes to the Task 1, Subtask 1 document are on the wiki at: *
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1
> * and the Task 1, Subtask 2 document at: *
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2
> *.  Changes are shown in ALL CAPS, strikeout, and curly brackets.  Thank
> you very much.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> *Actions/Summary:
> 1.  Task 1, Subtask 1:* There was discussion on Section 2, paragraph f.
> Work Team members suggested new language based on changes suggested by
> Rafik, with some modifications. In addition, Claudio suggested alternate
> language for Section 3, paragraph 2 during the meeting.  *Work Team
> members are requested to comment on the list on the following suggested
> changes:
> Section 2, para. f:* "IN CASE OF UNFAIR TREATMENT RESULTING IN THE
> REJECTION OF AN APPLICATION OR A DISPUTE, THE APPLICANT MAY LODGE A
> COMPLAINT WITH THE ICANN OMBUDSMAN {OR A MUTUALLY AGREED UPON NON-BIASED
> NEUTRAL THIRD PARTY}. THE PROCESS FOR LODGING A COMPLAINT WITH THE OMBUDSMAN
> IS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE V OF THE ICANN BYLAWS AND IN THE OMBUDSMAN
> FRAMEWORK, AVAILABLE AT
> http://www.icann.org/ombudsman/documents/ombudsman-framework-26mar09-en.pdf
> ".
> *Section 3, para. 2:* "{TO IMPROVE ACCESSIBILITY, TRANSPARENCY, AND
> ACCOUNTABILITY, ALL GROUPS SHOULD ESTABLISH AND PUBLISH A CONSENSUS BUILDING
> MODEL OR PROCESS IN THEIR BYLAWS OR CHARTER. THE PROCESS OR MODEL SHOULD BE
> BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES OF PARTICIPATION, REPRESENTATIVENESS, PROCESS
> INTEGRITY, FLEXIBILITY, TRANSPARENCY, OPENNESS, AND OTHER NORMS COMMON TO
> THE GNSO WG MODEL}. t{T}he use of voting {WITHIN POLICY DELIBERATIONS}
> should be minimized as much as possible." 7
> *2.  Task 1, Subtask 2:* The Work Team discussed Subtask 2 through Part
> II, Section 4 Elections.
> --*Work Team members: review the changes (in ALL CAPS and curly brackets
> {}) on the Wiki Page noted above.
> *--Section 1.5 Process Issues: *Discuss further with Victoria on 19
> February.
> *--*Claudio:** *Review Section 2 Committees, paragraphs c and d.
> --Section 3 Communications, para. b: (1) *Michael:* check the Registries
> Stakeholder Group Charter; (2)* Julie:* check the BGC recommendations, and
> also with respect to paragraphs c-f re: Constituency Disclosure Policy.
> --Section 4 Elections, para. b: *Claudio:* review the language.
>