Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 19 February Meeting

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck and Work Team members,

See my input below.  Thanks.

Julie


On 2/25/10 8:13 AM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Please see my input below.

Chuck

________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx  [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Julie  Hedlund
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:06 PM
To:  gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 19 February  Meeting



Dear Work Team members,

Here is the brief  summary and action items from today’s meeting.  Please let 
me know if you  have any changes or additions.  These also are listed on the 
wiki at: https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.

PLEASE  RESPOND RE: NEXT MEETING: On today’s call the Work Team members  
discussed the timing for the next meeting.  It was suggested that the  next 
meeting should be held a little later and should be scheduled for 60, not  90 
minutes.  The suggested time is Friday, 26 February from 1330 to  1430 UTC 
(0530 to 0630 PST/0830 to 0930 EST).   Please let  me know as soon as possible 
if you CANNOT meet at that time and, if so, if you  have suggestions for an 
alternate  time.

Actions/Summary:

--Task 1, Subtask  1: Work Team members on the call agreed to revised language 
presented by  Rafik on Section 2, paragraph f and by Claudio on Section 3, 
paragraph 2.  ACTION: All Work Team members are requested to review the revised 
 language at 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1
 
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1>
  as indicated in all caps and strikeout by Friday, 26 February. If no  
comments are received by that date the recommendations will be considered  
accepted by the Work Team.
[Gomes, Chuck] I support both of these  changes but in Section 3, paragraph 2, 
why did we not want to say  "THERE SHOULD BE  EMPHASIS ON CONSENSUS BUILDING IN 
GROUP  DELIBERATIONS."   That sentence seems to fit well  with what follows.
<JULIE> From my notes I believed that this was to be deleted, but I could be 
mistaken.

--Task 1, Subtask 2: Work Team  members on the call reviewed and discussed 
changes through Part II, Section 3  Communications. ACTION: All Work Team 
members are requested to review  the revised language in all caps, strikeout, 
and curly brackets through the  end of Section 3 at 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2
 
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2>
   and provide any comments by Friday, 26  February.
[Gomes, Chuck]  Is something missing in Part  II, 3.a?  It would help me to 
know what 3.a says without the  strikeouts.  Also, I think the lettering needs 
to be redone if b, d, e  & f are eliminated. 3.g is incomplete.  Something 
seems to be  missing in 4.a.  I think I am okay with the suggested edits but 
they are  very hard to follow.

<JULIE>  Here is the text for Section 3 without the strikeouts but with all 
caps and curly brackets to show what was added:
3. Communications
a. Constituency mailing {LISTS} and discussion groups shall be open to the 
entire constituency membership and, at the election of the Constituency in any 
given case, to the public. THE CONSTITUENCY MAY HAVE RESERVED LISTS IF NEEDED.
b. THE OUTCOME OF ALL CONSTITUENCY POLICY DECISIONS should be open and publicly 
archived --with posting rights limited to members at the election of the 
Constituency.
c. Information as to Constituency business and work product and finance and 
accounts and submissions to Staff and other ICANN entities shall be made 
available to the entire constituency membership unless there are valid grounds 
for restricting distribution.
{D}. All Constituencies shall have a published Privacy Policy providing for the 
protection of the {PRIVATE} data of members.

In addition, with respect to 4a, the word “Constituency” was inadvertently 
deleted.  I have reinserted it.


Thank you very much.

Best  regards,

Julie