RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 09 April 2010 Meeting

[Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Rafik's proposed amendment.



I cannot understand why Constituency Executive Committees should be excluded.



Regards,



Victoria McEvedy

Principal

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys

cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC



96 Westbourne Park Road

London

W2 5PL



T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169



www.mcevedy.eu

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.



From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 13 April 2010 14:11
To: Rafik Dammak
Cc: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 09 April 2010 Meeting



Hello Rafik,

Just to be clear, the original suggested language from the WT, as agreed to on 
Friday's call, what that the requirement should only apply to Stakeholder Group 
(not Constituency) Executive Committee members.  That is why the suggested 
language reads as follows (emphasis added): "No person shall serve as a GROUP 
Councilor or Officer or as a Stakeholder Group Executive Committee member for 
more than four consecutive years."

Thanks,
Julie


On 4/13/10 4:28 AM, "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,

just an addition to the new part II, section 1:
"No person shall serve as a GROUP Councilor or Officer or as a Stakeholder 
Group and Constituency Executive Committee member for more than four 
consecutive years."
as the recommendation is applied to the SG, it should be applied to 
constituency too, maybe we should say "GROUPs Excecutive Committee"


Regards

Rafik

2010/4/10 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

Dear Work Team members,

Here are the actions/summary from today's meeting.  Please let me know if you 
have any changes or questions.  Our next meeting will be held next Friday, 16 
April at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for one hour.  The actions and summary are 
included on the wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.   Please 
note that because the meeting times are very early for those Work Team members 
on the West Coast it was suggested that we may wish to select a time later in 
the day on Friday's.  However, some Work Team members and staff may have 
conflicts.  Please let me know ASAP if you would prefer to move the call to a 
particular time and I will check to see whether there are staff or other 
conflicts.  Thank you.

Best regards,

Julie

Summary/Action Items:
1. Deadlines: Olga noted that the deadline for submitting the WT's 
recommendations for Task 1, Subtasks 1-3 to the OSC is 01 June. She asked Julie 
to compile the Subtask recommendations into one document once they all are 
approved.

2. Task 1, Subtask 2: The WT members discussed language for term limits and 
agreed to an option suggested by Chuck and modified by Tony that would apply 
term limits to GROUP Councilors and Officers, and to Stakeholder Group 
Executive Committee members.  Olga asked Julie to draft language for a new 
section on Term Limits for the WT to review. With respect to Part II, Section 8 
Policy, Olga asked Julie to include the language suggested by Mary Wong for the 
WT to review.  On Annex B, Tony suggested deleting the section and the WT 
members on the call agreed, noting that there was agreement among WT members at 
the meeting in Seoul, South Korea also to delete Annex B.  Olga asked Julie to 
produce a Word document of Task 1, Subtask 2 including the changes agreed to 
thus far and indicating additions and deletions using tracked changes. ACTION: 
WT members should review the attached document and recommend any further 
changes.  In particular, WT members should note the following 1) new Part II, 
Section 1 Term Limits; 2) Mary Wong's proposed language for Section 9c 
(previously 8c) Policy, and 3) Section 10 GNSO Working Group through to the end 
of the document.

3. Task 1, Subtask 3: Olga noted that no WT members had suggested changes to 
Subtask 3. Julie suggested resending the document to the WT to confirm that 
there are no changes and that the text is approved. ACTION: Work Team members 
should review the attached document and either recommend any further changes or 
indicate that they agree to the text.

4. Task 2: ACTION: Debra Hughes is preparing preliminary thoughts.





__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5024 (20100413) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com