Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 16 April 2010 Meeting

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,

Thank you very much for the clarification.  It’s quite helpful.

Best regards,

Julie


On 4/16/10 4:09 PM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks Julie.  I have two comments: 1) The Executive Summary should only 
include brief background information with more detailed information in the 
latter part of the document; 2) the Summary of Minority Reports in Section 3 
should only include a list of any minority recommendations and detailed 
minority statements would be included later.  I suspect that you understand 
this already, but wanted to make sure.

Chuck



________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx  [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Julie  Hedlund
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 3:13 PM
To:  gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 16 April 2010  Meeting


Dear Work Team members,

Here are the  actions/summary from today’s meeting.  Please let me know if you 
have any  changes or questions.  Our next meeting will be held next Friday, 23  
April at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for one hour.  The actions  and summary are 
included on the wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.    As my 
primary action item, as requested I will combine all of the  Task 1 
recommendations into one document organized as described below.  I  hope to 
send the document to you to review early next week.  Thank  you.

Best regards,

Julie

Discussion/Action  Items:

1. Organization and Formatting of Task 1  Recommendations: The WT members 
discussed the organization of the Task 1  recommendations (subtasks 1-3) into 
one document. Olga suggested that the  recommendations should be put together 
in one section and duplicates (such as  those in Subtask 2 Part IV Analysis) 
should be reconciled with the  recommendations in Subtask 2 Part II. Rafik 
noted that it was important to  include the analysis and background and Chuck 
suggested that these could be  summarized in an executive summary with the 
details retained as an appendix or  annex. The WT members on the call agreed to 
the following organization 1.  Executive Summary with background 2. 
Recommendations 3. Summary of Minority  Reports 4. Annexes/appendices with 
detailed analysis and including the text  from Subtask 2 Section IV Subsection 
3.12 Dealings with Staff: A Code of  Practice. Olga asked Julie Hedlund to 
produce a combined  document.

2. Task 1, Subtask 2, Part II, Section 1 Term Limits:  There was extensive 
discussion on term limits. Claudio noted that the latest  version did not 
include previous language he had suggested. Rafik noted his  concern that term 
limits should be applied to both Stakeholder Group and  Constituency Executive 
Committee members. The WT members on the call agreed to  separate the term 
limits into three sections applying to 1) councilors; 2)  officers; 3) 
executive committee members. The WT members asked Julie to  provide revised 
language to be included in the combined set of  recommendations.