<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 16 April 2010 Meeting
- To: "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-osc-csg" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 16 April 2010 Meeting
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:09:55 -0400
Thanks Julie. I have two comments: 1) The Executive Summary should only
include brief background information with more detailed information in
the latter part of the document; 2) the Summary of Minority Reports in
Section 3 should only include a list of any minority recommendations and
detailed minority statements would be included later. I suspect that
you understand this already, but wanted to make sure.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 3:13 PM
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 16 April 2010 Meeting
Dear Work Team members,
Here are the actions/summary from today's meeting. Please let
me know if you have any changes or questions. Our next meeting will be
held next Friday, 23 April at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for one hour.
The actions and summary are included on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
As my primary action item, as requested I will combine all of the Task 1
recommendations into one document organized as described below. I hope
to send the document to you to review early next week. Thank you.
Best regards,
Julie
Discussion/Action Items:
1. Organization and Formatting of Task 1 Recommendations: The WT
members discussed the organization of the Task 1 recommendations
(subtasks 1-3) into one document. Olga suggested that the
recommendations should be put together in one section and duplicates
(such as those in Subtask 2 Part IV Analysis) should be reconciled with
the recommendations in Subtask 2 Part II. Rafik noted that it was
important to include the analysis and background and Chuck suggested
that these could be summarized in an executive summary with the details
retained as an appendix or annex. The WT members on the call agreed to
the following organization 1. Executive Summary with background 2.
Recommendations 3. Summary of Minority Reports 4. Annexes/appendices
with detailed analysis and including the text from Subtask 2 Section IV
Subsection 3.12 Dealings with Staff: A Code of Practice. Olga asked
Julie Hedlund to produce a combined document.
2. Task 1, Subtask 2, Part II, Section 1 Term Limits: There was
extensive discussion on term limits. Claudio noted that the latest
version did not include previous language he had suggested. Rafik noted
his concern that term limits should be applied to both Stakeholder Group
and Constituency Executive Committee members. The WT members on the call
agreed to separate the term limits into three sections applying to 1)
councilors; 2) officers; 3) executive committee members. The WT members
asked Julie to provide revised language to be included in the combined
set of recommendations.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|