Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 16 April 2010 Meeting

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Julie, looking forward to reviewing the first draft of the document.
Regards and have a nice weekend.
Olga

2010/4/16 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

>  Dear Work Team members,
>
> Here are the actions/summary from today’s meeting.  Please let me know if
> you have any changes or questions.  Our next meeting will be held n*ext
> Friday, 23 April at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for one hour.*  The actions
> and summary are included on the wiki at: *
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team*.
>   As my primary action item, as requested I will combine all of the Task 1
> recommendations into one document organized as described below.  I hope to
> send the document to you to review early next week.  Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> *Discussion/Action Items:
> *
> *1. Organization and Formatting of Task 1 Recommendations:* The WT members
> discussed the organization of the Task 1 recommendations (subtasks 1-3) into
> one document. Olga suggested that the recommendations should be put together
> in one section and duplicates (such as those in Subtask 2 Part IV Analysis)
> should be reconciled with the recommendations in Subtask 2 Part II. Rafik
> noted that it was important to include the analysis and background and Chuck
> suggested that these could be summarized in an executive summary with the
> details retained as an appendix or annex. The WT members on the call agreed
> to the following organization 1. Executive Summary with background 2.
> Recommendations 3. Summary of Minority Reports 4. Annexes/appendices with
> detailed analysis and including the text from Subtask 2 Section IV
> Subsection 3.12 Dealings with Staff: A Code of Practice. Olga asked Julie
> Hedlund to produce a combined document.
>
> *2. Task 1, Subtask 2, Part II, Section 1 Term Limits:* There was
> extensive discussion on term limits. Claudio noted that the latest version
> did not include previous language he had suggested. Rafik noted his concern
> that term limits should be applied to both Stakeholder Group and
> Constituency Executive Committee members. The WT members on the call agreed
> to separate the term limits into three sections applying to 1) councilors;
> 2) officers; 3) executive committee members. The WT members asked Julie to
> provide revised language to be included in the combined set of
> recommendations.
>