RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Julie.  I suggest that we add "Recommended" in front of "Common
Operating Principles . . ." in the title.

 

I also think that we should add the following sentence at the end of the
first paragraph in Section 2 following "A minority recommendation is
included on page 9, which is supported by Victoria McEvedy, Intellectual
Property Interests Constituency and S.S. Kshatriya, Individual.": "The
full minority report from Victoria and S.S. is included as Appendix A."

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:13 PM
To: Olga Cavalli; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1

 

Dear Olga and Work Team members,

I have made some slight corrections to the document.  Please see the
attached revised version.  I have included a reference to Appendix A,
suggested by Victoria, and also some missing links in the Minority
Report.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Julie


On 5/26/10 3:36 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks so much Julie.
Lets review this last version and if we are ok with it we can send it to
the OSC after our conf call on Friday.
Regards
Olga

2010/5/26 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

Dear Olga and Work Team members,

Attached is the revised document for review.  I have deleted the
reference to the figure on page 9 as Krista requested and I have made
the edits that Victoria has requested.  Please let me know if I have
correctly captured the requested revisions or if there are further
changes.  The changes are marked in redline for ease of identification.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Julie



On 5/25/10 5:47 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <
http://olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:

Thanks Krista and Victoria for the good reviews and suggestions about
the Task 1 document. I agree with them.
Other comments are also welcome.
Julie please include these suggested changes into a new version of the
document and send it to our list.
If the Working Team is ok with this version we will send it to Phillip
Shepard next Friday after our conference call.
I will take silence as an ok for sending the document, unless there are
other changes suggested before Friday.
Regards
Olga

2010/5/24 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx <
http://julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> >

Dear Victoria,

Thank you for these suggestions.  These seem to be helpful and logical
changes.

Best regards,

Julie



On 5/20/10 1:08 PM, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx <
http://victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>  <http://victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:

Dear Julie and WT,  
 
As the Minority Recommendation relates to items 2.1 and 2.2 -it should
follow the Majority Recommendations on those topics---and not sit behind
Databases which are unrelated.  
 
I would suggest it might go at 2.2.10 n page 8.  
 
I would also suggest the introduction to the Majority Recommendations on
page 3-4 should make clear that they are Majority Recommendations and
indicate the level of support and that there follows a Minority
Recommendation and the page on which it can be found. 
 
Thanks and best,  
 
 

 
Victoria McEvedy
Principal 
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys 
 

96 Westbourne Park Road 
London 
W2 5PL
 
T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

www.mcevedy.eu <http://www.mcevedy.eu>  <http://www.mcevedy.eu>  
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <http://owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
<http://owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>  [
mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund

Sent: 20 May 2010 17:48
To: Olga Cavalli; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1

Dear Olga and Work Team Members,

Here is the revised document that includes the new title agreed to at
the last meeting and the changes proposed by Claudio prior to the last
meeting.  In addition, it includes the minority recommendation and the
minority report.  This also is posted to our wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
Note that I made a minor formatting change to the minority report when I
integrated it into the document: I changed the font to Times New Roman
for the sake of consistency.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Julie


On 5/18/10 2:30 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <
http://olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>  <http://olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Victoria,
thanks for the clarification and my apologies for the misunderstanding.
Julie please include the Minority Recommendation into the final Task 1
document and send the complete version to the list for final revision.
Best regards
Olga

2010/5/18 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx <
http://victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>  <http://victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> >

There seems to be some misunderstanding Olga. 
 
Only one Minority Recommendation is made by SS and me -the below: 
 
1.
     We recommend the GNSO adopt a simple standard pre-fabricated
Constituency structure and procedure(s) based on one member one vote and
applicable to all Constituencies--with a menu/pull down list of accepted
variations (to be kept to an absolute minimum). We recommend a simple
standard meeting and committee procedure applying to all Constituencies.
We recommend a standard handbook on Constituency practice and procedure.
We recommend that this be translated into the 5 UN languages.  


 

The balance is commentary and analysis ----and is not for extraction.
It after all entirely up to the Minority to identify their
recommendations.  I repeat -no other Minority Recommendation is made. I
hope this now clarifies the issue.  Please advise.  Please also be aware
that the Minority Report is the authors' intellectual property and moral
rights are asserted.  
 
Thank you. 
 
Regards, 
 
 
Victoria McEvedy
Principal 
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys 


96 Westbourne Park Road 
London 
W2 5PL
 
T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

www.mcevedy.eu <http://www.mcevedy.eu>  <http://www.mcevedy.eu>  <
http://www.mcevedy.eu>   
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <http://owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
<http://owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>  [
mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli

Sent: 18 May 2010 19:03
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1

 
Dear Work Team members,

We are now close to finishing our Task 1 document. 

The document will include also the revised Minority Report from Victoria
and SS. 

In addition to this general document with all its parts and minority
report, I am asking Julie to prepare a comparison table of the
recommendations in the Minority Report and in the WT report.  This will
not replace the Minority Report, which will be submitted in its entirety
along with the WT report.  The recommendations from both the WT report
and the minority report will be quoted verbatim in the comparison table
with corresponding section, page, and line numbers for ease of
reference.

Julie, if you could complete the comparison this week that would be very
helpful. 

Your comments are welcome, it could be good if we can submit our final
Task 1 document to the OSC by May 28.

Best regards,
Olga 
 
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5125 (20100518) __________

 
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 
http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5125 (20100518) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5132 (20100520) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5133 (20100520) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com