<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1
- To: "'Victoria McEvedy'" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Julie Hedlund'" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Olga Cavalli'" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, "'gnso-osc-csg'" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1
- From: "Michael Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:15:26 -0400
Dear Victoria,
Given your stated concern, I suggest you draft a personal note to the OSC if
you believe they may attempt to "delete or suppress" your minority report
from presentation to the GNSO. I certainly cannot speak for the rest of the
working group, BUT I personally will not support a note that insinuates the
members of the OSC might behave in anything less than a professional and
transparent manner.
Best Regards,
Michael Young
Vice-President,
Product Development
Afilias
O: +14166734109
C: +16472891220
From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: May-26-10 3:42 PM
To: Julie Hedlund; Olga Cavalli; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1
One further point ---I note that we would not expect to see the OSC now in
any way delete or suppress our minority report or recommendation and these
should be passed on the GNSO Council.
I don't know how this should be communicated to the OSC but perhaps it could
be passed on with the Report.
Thanks and best,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its attachments may also
be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
is created by this email communication.
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 26 May 2010 20:27
To: Olga Cavalli; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1
Dear Olga and Work Team members,
Attached is the revised document for review. I have deleted the reference
to the figure on page 9 as Krista requested and I have made the edits that
Victoria has requested. Please let me know if I have correctly captured the
requested revisions or if there are further changes. The changes are marked
in redline for ease of identification.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Julie
On 5/25/10 5:47 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Krista and Victoria for the good reviews and suggestions about the
Task 1 document. I agree with them.
Other comments are also welcome.
Julie please include these suggested changes into a new version of the
document and send it to our list.
If the Working Team is ok with this version we will send it to Phillip
Shepard next Friday after our conference call.
I will take silence as an ok for sending the document, unless there are
other changes suggested before Friday.
Regards
Olga
2010/5/24 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear Victoria,
Thank you for these suggestions. These seem to be helpful and logical
changes.
Best regards,
Julie
On 5/20/10 1:08 PM, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx
<http://victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Dear Julie and WT,
As the Minority Recommendation relates to items 2.1 and 2.2 -it should
follow the Majority Recommendations on those topics---and not sit behind
Databases which are unrelated.
I would suggest it might go at 2.2.10 n page 8.
I would also suggest the introduction to the Majority Recommendations on
page 3-4 should make clear that they are Majority Recommendations and
indicate the level of support and that there follows a Minority
Recommendation and the page on which it can be found.
Thanks and best,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu <http://www.mcevedy.eu>
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its attachments may also
be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
is created by this email communication.
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <http://owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 20 May 2010 17:48
To: Olga Cavalli; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1
Dear Olga and Work Team Members,
Here is the revised document that includes the new title agreed to at the
last meeting and the changes proposed by Claudio prior to the last meeting.
In addition, it includes the minority recommendation and the minority
report. This also is posted to our wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team. Note
that I made a minor formatting change to the minority report when I
integrated it into the document: I changed the font to Times New Roman for
the sake of consistency.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Julie
On 5/18/10 2:30 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
<http://olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Victoria,
thanks for the clarification and my apologies for the misunderstanding.
Julie please include the Minority Recommendation into the final Task 1
document and send the complete version to the list for final revision.
Best regards
Olga
2010/5/18 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx <http://victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
There seems to be some misunderstanding Olga.
Only one Minority Recommendation is made by SS and me -the below:
1. We recommend the GNSO adopt a simple standard pre-fabricated
Constituency structure and procedure(s) based on one member one vote and
applicable to all Constituencies--with a menu/pull down list of accepted
variations (to be kept to an absolute minimum). We recommend a simple
standard meeting and committee procedure applying to all Constituencies. We
recommend a standard handbook on Constituency practice and procedure. We
recommend that this be translated into the 5 UN languages.
The balance is commentary and analysis ----and is not for extraction. It
after all entirely up to the Minority to identify their recommendations. I
repeat -no other Minority Recommendation is made. I hope this now clarifies
the issue. Please advise. Please also be aware that the Minority Report is
the authors' intellectual property and moral rights are asserted.
Thank you.
Regards,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu <http://www.mcevedy.eu> <http://www.mcevedy.eu>
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its attachments may also
be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
is created by this email communication.
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx <http://owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: 18 May 2010 19:03
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1
Dear Work Team members,
We are now close to finishing our Task 1 document.
The document will include also the revised Minority Report from Victoria and
SS.
In addition to this general document with all its parts and minority report,
I am asking Julie to prepare a comparison table of the recommendations in
the Minority Report and in the WT report. This will not replace the
Minority Report, which will be submitted in its entirety along with the WT
report. The recommendations from both the WT report and the minority report
will be quoted verbatim in the comparison table with corresponding section,
page, and line numbers for ease of reference.
Julie, if you could complete the comparison this week that would be very
helpful.
Your comments are welcome, it could be good if we can submit our final Task
1 document to the OSC by May 28.
Best regards,
Olga
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5125 (20100518) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5125 (20100518) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5132 (20100520) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5133 (20100520) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5148 (20100526) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5148 (20100526) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|