Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Krista and Victoria for the good reviews and suggestions about the
Task 1 document. I agree with them.
Other comments are also welcome.
Julie please include these suggested changes into a new version of the
document and send it to our list.
If the Working Team is ok with this version we will send it to Phillip
Shepard next Friday after our conference call.
I will take silence as an ok for sending the document, unless there are
other changes suggested before Friday.
Regards
Olga

2010/5/24 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

>  Dear Victoria,
>
> Thank you for these suggestions.  These seem to be helpful and logical
> changes.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> On 5/20/10 1:08 PM, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear Julie and WT,
>
> As the Minority Recommendation relates to items 2.1 and 2.2 –it should
> follow the Majority Recommendations on those topics---and not sit behind
> Databases which are unrelated.
>
> I would suggest it might go at 2.2.10 n page 8.
>
> I would also suggest the introduction to the Majority Recommendations on
> page 3-4 should make clear that they are Majority Recommendations and
> indicate the level of support and that there follows a Minority
> Recommendation and the page on which it can be found.
>
> Thanks and best,
>
>
>
>
> Victoria McEvedy
> Principal
> McEvedys
> *Solicitors** and Attorneys
> *
>
> 96 Westbourne Park Road
> London
> W2 5PL
>
> T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
> F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
> M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169
> *
> www.mcevedy.eu
> *
> Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
> This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
> exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also
> be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
> know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
> reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
> This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
> is created by this email communication.
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx<owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Julie Hedlund
> *Sent:* 20 May 2010 17:48
> *To:* Olga Cavalli; gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1
>
> Dear Olga and Work Team Members,
>
> Here is the revised document that includes the new title agreed to at the
> last meeting and the changes proposed by Claudio prior to the last meeting.
>  In addition, it includes the minority recommendation and the minority
> report.  This also is posted to our wiki at:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
>  Note that I made a minor formatting change to the minority report when I
> integrated it into the document: I changed the font to Times New Roman for
> the sake of consistency.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Julie
>
>
> On 5/18/10 2:30 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Victoria,
> thanks for the clarification and my apologies for the misunderstanding.
> Julie please include the Minority Recommendation into the final Task 1
> document and send the complete version to the list for final revision.
> Best regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/5/18 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> There seems to be some misunderstanding Olga.
>
> Only one Minority Recommendation is made by SS and me –the below:
>
> 1.      We recommend the GNSO adopt a simple standard pre-fabricated
> Constituency structure and procedure(s) based on one member one vote and
> applicable to all Constituencies--with a menu/pull down list of accepted
> variations (to be kept to an absolute minimum). We recommend a simple
> standard meeting and committee procedure applying to all Constituencies. We
> recommend a standard handbook on Constituency practice and procedure. We
> recommend that this be translated into the 5 UN languages.
>
>
>
> The balance is commentary and analysis ----and is not for extraction.  It
> after all entirely up to the Minority to identify their recommendations.  I
> repeat –no other Minority Recommendation is made. I hope this now clarifies
> the issue.  Please advise.  Please also be aware that the Minority Report is
> the authors’ intellectual property and moral rights are asserted.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Victoria McEvedy
> Principal
> McEvedys
> *Solicitors** and Attorneys
> *
>
> 96 Westbourne Park Road
> London
> W2 5PL
>
> T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
> F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
> M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169
> *
> www.mcevedy.eu <http://www.mcevedy.eu>
> *Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
> This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
> exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also
> be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
> know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
> reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
> This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
> is created by this email communication.
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx<owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
> *Sent:* 18 May 2010 19:03
> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps to completing Task 1
>
>
> Dear Work Team members,
>
> We are now close to finishing our Task 1 document.
>
> The document will include also the revised Minority Report from Victoria
> and SS.
>
> In addition to this general document with all its parts and minority
> report, I am asking Julie to prepare a comparison table of the
> recommendations in the Minority Report and in the WT report.  This will not
> replace the Minority Report, which will be submitted in its entirety along
> with the WT report.  The recommendations from both the WT report and the
> minority report will be quoted verbatim in the comparison table with
> corresponding section, page, and line numbers for ease of reference.
>
> Julie, if you could complete the comparison this week that would be very
> helpful.
>
> Your comments are welcome, it could be good if we can submit our final Task
> 1 document to the OSC by May 28.
>
> Best regards,
> Olga
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 5125 (20100518) __________
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 5125 (20100518) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 5132 (20100520) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 5133 (20100520) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>