ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Motion as Approved on the Call Today

  • To: "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-osc-csg" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Motion as Approved on the Call Today
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:07:50 -0400

The motion looks fine to me except that we should thank the CSG WT and
the OSC.  I wonder though whether at some point we should publish and
post a document titled GNSO Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operating
Procedures that itself should be approved by the Council; it would only
include what is Section 2 in the report; that could happen later with a
separate motion or could happen with this motion.

 

Chuck 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:21 AM
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Motion as Approved on the Call Today

 

Olga and Work Team members,

Here is the motion as approved on today's call.  Olga has agreed to
present the motion and Rafik as agreed to second it.

Thanks,
Julie

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 23 June 2010 meeting in Brussels,
accepted a set of deliverables submitted by the GNSO Council Operations
Work Team (GCOT)
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_team>  and the
Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operations Work Team (CSG-WT)
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team>
;

WHEREAS, a twenty-one (21) day Public Comment Forum
<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#gcot-csg-recommendations>
completed between 28 June 2010 and 18 July 2010 and a Staff Summary and
Analysis
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/gcot-csg-recommendations/msg00001.html>
has been published;
WHEREAS, the GNSO Council agreed to take action on the these
deliverables as soon as possible after the end of the public comment
period;

WHEREAS, there were no public comments submitted that would amend any of
the GCOT or CSG-WT recommendations;

NOW, BE IT THEREFORE:

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the following set of GCOT
documents, without further modification, and directs Staff to publish a
new version of the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) containing these
sections and chapters:
*         Section 2.1-Council Member Term Limits
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-term-limits-24may
10-en.pdf>
*         Section 2.4-Board Seat Elections
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-board-seat-electi
ons-24may10-en.pdf>
*         Section 3.8-Absences and Vacancies
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-absences-vacancie
s-11jun10-en.pdf>
*         Chapter 4.0-Voting
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-voting-11jun10-en
.pdf>
*         Chapter 5.0-Statements and Disclosures of Interest
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-soi-doi-11jun10-e
n.pdf>
o   Note that two sections, 5.3.2 and 5.3.3, are not approved pending
further Staff action to be determined.  These sections are footnoted in
the document as "inactive" until subsequently approved by the OSC and
Council.

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council approves the following CSG-WT
deliverable and directs Staff to provide these recommendations to GNSO
Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies for use in amending their
charters, as appropriate:

*         Recommended Common Operating Principles and Participation
Guidelines for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; and
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.
pdf>
Recommendations on a GNSO Database of Community Members
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.
pdf>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy