RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Motion as Approved on the Call Today

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rafik,

 

Where would you suggest the CSG operating procedures go if not in the GNSO 
Operating Procedures?  It seems reasonable to me that the GNSO Operating 
Procedures would include Council Operating Procedures, CSG Operating 
Procedures, WG Operating Procedures, PDP Operating Procedures and Communication 
Procedures.  In fact, it may be that the GOP should be organized in that way if 
they aren’t already, but that is something we could do later.

 

Chuck

 

From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 6:29 AM
To: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Motion as Approved on the Call Today

 

Hello,

 

any reason for the inclusion in the GOP?

 

Rafik

2010/7/27 Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi
I also like the edits.
Comments are welcome, otherwise I will submit the motion to the council list.
Regards
Olga

Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar) 

________________________________

From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 

Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:47:39 -0400

To: Julie Hedlund<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>; Olga Cavalli<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>

Cc: gnso-osc-csg<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>

Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Motion as Approved on the Call Today

 

I  really like the suggested edits to the motion.

 

Chuck

 

From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:37 PM
To: Olga Cavalli; Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Motion as Approved on the Call Today

 

Olga and Chuck,

What do you think about including the GNSO Constituency and Stakeholder Group 
Operating Procedures as a Chapter in the GNSO Council Operating Procedures?  
Here’s a revised draft motion that includes language in that regard as well as 
a Resolved Further clause thanking the Work Teams.  The changes are in red.  
See what you think.  Thanks.

Best regards,

Julie

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 23 June 2010 meeting in Brussels, accepted a 
set of deliverables submitted by the GNSO Council Operations Work Team (GCOT) 
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_team>  and the 
Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operations Work Team (CSG-WT) 
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team> ;

WHEREAS, a twenty-one (21) day Public Comment Forum 
<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#gcot-csg-recommendations> completed 
between 28 June 2010 and 18 July 2010 and a Staff Summary and Analysis 
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/gcot-csg-recommendations/msg00001.html> has been 
published;
WHEREAS, the GNSO Council agreed to take action on the these deliverables as 
soon as possible after the end of the public comment period;

WHEREAS, there were no public comments submitted that would amend any of the 
GCOT or CSG-WT recommendations;

NOW, BE IT THEREFORE:

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the following set of GCOT documents, 
without further modification, which Staff has incorporated and directs Staff to 
publish into a new version of the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) <Link TBD> 
containing these sections and chapters:
·         Section 2.1-Council Member Term Limits 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-term-limits-24may10-en.pdf>

·         Section 2.4-Board Seat Elections 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-board-seat-elections-24may10-en.pdf>

·         Section 3.8-Absences and Vacancies 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-absences-vacancies-11jun10-en.pdf>

·         Chapter 4.0-Voting 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-voting-11jun10-en.pdf>

·         Chapter 5.0-Statements and Disclosures of Interest 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-soi-doi-11jun10-en.pdf>

[Note that two sections, 5.3.2 and 5.3.3, are not approved pending further 
Staff action to be determined.  These sections are footnoted in the document as 
“inactive” until subsequently approved by the OSC and Council]. 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council approves the following CSG-WT 
deliverable and directs Staff to publish into a new version of the GNSO 
Operating Procedures (GOP) <Link TBD> and to provide these recommendations to 
GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies for use in amending their charters, 
as appropriate:
·         Recommended Common Operating Principles and Participation Guidelines 
for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; and  
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.pdf 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.pdf> >
Recommendations on a GNSO Database of Community Members 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.pdf 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.pdf> 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council hereby expresses its gratitude and 
appreciation for the GCOT and CSG Work Teams’ dedication, commitment, and 
thoughtful recommendations.  


On 7/23/10 11:11 AM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks Chuck.
It think that we may add both textes in this motion, thanks and the posting of 
the section 2 part.
Other commens on this regard are welcome.
Regards
Olga

2010/7/23 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

The motion looks fine to me except that we should thank the CSG WT and the OSC. 
 I wonder though whether at some point we should publish and post a document 
titled GNSO Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operating Procedures that itself 
should be approved by the Council; it would only include what is Section 2 in 
the report; that could happen later with a separate motion or could happen with 
this motion.
 
Chuck 
 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:21 AM
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Motion as Approved on the Call Today

 
Olga and Work Team members,

Here is the motion as approved on today’s call.  Olga has agreed to present the 
motion and Rafik as agreed to second it.

Thanks,
Julie

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 23 June 2010 meeting in Brussels, accepted a 
set of deliverables submitted by the GNSO Council Operations Work Team (GCOT) 
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_team>  and the 
Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operations Work Team (CSG-WT) 
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team> ;

WHEREAS, a twenty-one (21) day Public Comment Forum 
<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#gcot-csg-recommendations> completed 
between 28 June 2010 and 18 July 2010 and a Staff Summary and Analysis 
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/gcot-csg-recommendations/msg00001.html> has been 
published;
WHEREAS, the GNSO Council agreed to take action on the these deliverables as 
soon as possible after the end of the public comment period;

WHEREAS, there were no public comments submitted that would amend any of the 
GCOT or CSG-WT recommendations;

NOW, BE IT THEREFORE:

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the following set of GCOT documents, 
without further modification, and directs Staff to publish a new version of the 
GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) containing these sections and chapters:
·         Section 2.1-Council Member Term Limits 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-term-limits-24may10-en.pdf>
·         Section 2.4-Board Seat Elections 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-board-seat-elections-24may10-en.pdf>
·         Section 3.8-Absences and Vacancies 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-absences-vacancies-11jun10-en.pdf>
·         Chapter 4.0-Voting 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-voting-11jun10-en.pdf>
·         Chapter 5.0-Statements and Disclosures of Interest 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-soi-doi-11jun10-en.pdf>
o   Note that two sections, 5.3.2 and 5.3.3, are not approved pending further 
Staff action to be determined.  These sections are footnoted in the document as 
“inactive” until subsequently approved by the OSC and Council.

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council approves the following CSG-WT 
deliverable and directs Staff to provide these recommendations to GNSO 
Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies for use in amending their charters, as 
appropriate:

·         Recommended Common Operating Principles and Participation Guidelines 
for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; and  
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.pdf>
Recommendations on a GNSO Database of Community Members 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.pdf>