All
I accept the amendment. I would appreciate if for the upcomimg
discussion on the "rules for the establishment of new constituencies
within stakeholder groups" the "current specifications" could be put
together - maybe by Julie. That seems to be our common basis.
Thanks and regards
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Von:* owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] *Im Auftrag von *Ray Fassett
*Gesendet:* Freitag, 24. April 2009 02:47
*An:* 'Ron Andruff'; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
*Betreff:* RE: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter
Ron, I’ve read your friendly amendment a few times and see no
substantive change to the edit we approved. It is accepted. Julie can
you please perform the change on the wiki site. Thank you.
Ray
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ron Andruff
*Sent:* Thursday, April 23, 2009 6:10 PM
*To:* 'Ray Fassett'; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter
Ray,
I reread the Charter again and realized that we need to add a few more
words to our edit… It now reads as follows:
• **<Review>** rules for the establishment of new constituencies
within stakeholder groups, while recognizing that differences exist
between stakeholder groups and constituencies.
I suggest the following friendly amendment:
• **<Review>** the current specifications and recommend rules for the
establishment of new constituencies within stakeholder groups, while
recognizing that differences exist between stakeholder groups and
constituencies.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor
New York, New York 10001
www.rnapartners.com <http://www.rnapartners.com>
V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11
F: +1 212 481 2859
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ray Fassett
*Sent:* 2009-04-23 13:43
*To:* gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter
Hello Team, very productive teleconference call today, I think. While
our group may be small, I believe we are speaking freely allowing the
flow of ideas to form into concepts. As the Chair of this Work Team, I
am very pleased for this evolution and thank each one of you for
enabling it. Let’s keep it up.
As a reminder, Julie has completed the one minor edit to our draft
Charter agreed to today by those on the call. Here is the link:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_work_team_draft_charter
You will visibly see the minor edit (i.e. “before and after”) in the
5^th bullet point under Section 1, Team Charter Goals. For those of
you not on the call today, the reason we reached rough consensus for
this minor change is due to the fact that there are already rules for
the establishment of new constituencies thus we felt the task was more
to “review” and provide any recommendations rather “prepare”. So,
again, a minor but accurate edit as we saw it.
With this said, those on the call today agreed by rough consensus to
approve the draft Charter (with the aforementioned edit) as contained
at the link above and to communicate such approval by our Work Team to
the Steering Committee. We also agreed that those unable to attend
today’s conference call have the ability to weigh in with their
view/comments of the draft Charter by response to this e-mail. We
would consider no further comment to the draft Charter by end of day
next Tuesday, April 28, as non-objection by a Work Team member to our
communicating to the Steering Committee our Work Team’s approval of
the draft Charter. I will also note that our approval of the draft
Charter does not mean we can not later change it. It only means we’ve
accepted it.
Our next call is scheduled for next Wednesday, April 29^th at 16:00
UTC which is 12:00 pm EST (note the one hour time change). It will
then go back to a two week cycle at the same 16:00 UTC time. Glen will
send a reminder for the call next week as she normally does and I will
send a brief agenda as well prior to the call.
I expect that in the meantime, there will be new e-mail thread for you
to be on the lookout pertaining to the duty separation document we’ve
been discussing. For those not on the call today, I think you will be
able catch up on this status fairly quickly and I encourage you to
participate with your thoughts upon your review of it.
Ray