AW: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter

[<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

All
 
I accept the amendment. I would appreciate if for the upcomimg
discussion on the "rules for the establishment of new constituencies
within stakeholder groups" the "current specifications" could be put
together - maybe by Julie. That seems to be our common basis.
 

Thanks and regards
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben



 

  _____  

Von: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Ray Fassett
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. April 2009 02:47
An: 'Ron Andruff'; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter



Ron, I've read your friendly amendment a few times and see no
substantive change to the edit we approved.  It is accepted.  Julie can
you please perform the change on the wiki site.  Thank you.

 

Ray

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 6:10 PM
To: 'Ray Fassett'; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter

 

Ray,

 

I reread the Charter again and realized that we need to add a few more
words to our edit...  It now reads as follows:

 

*  <Review> rules for the establishment of new constituencies within
stakeholder groups, while recognizing that differences exist between
stakeholder groups and constituencies.

 

I suggest the following friendly amendment: 

 

*  <Review> the current specifications and recommend rules for the
establishment of new constituencies within stakeholder groups, while
recognizing that differences exist between stakeholder groups and
constituencies.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor

New York, New York 10001

 

 <http://www.rnapartners.com> www.rnapartners.com 

V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11

F:  +1 212 481 2859 

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ray Fassett
Sent: 2009-04-23 13:43
To: gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter

 

Hello Team, very productive teleconference call today, I think.  While
our group may be small, I believe we are speaking freely allowing the
flow of ideas to form into concepts.  As the Chair of this Work Team, I
am very pleased for this evolution and thank each one of you for
enabling it.  Let's keep it up.

 

As a reminder, Julie has completed the one minor edit to our draft
Charter agreed to today by those on the call.  Here is the link:

 

https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_work_team_draft
_charter

 

You will visibly see the minor edit (i.e. "before and after") in the 5th
bullet point under Section 1, Team Charter Goals.  For those of you not
on the call today, the reason we reached rough consensus for this minor
change is due to the fact that there are already rules for the
establishment of new constituencies thus we felt the task was more to
"review" and provide any recommendations rather "prepare".  So, again, a
minor but accurate edit as we saw it.

 

With this said, those on the call today agreed by rough consensus to
approve the draft Charter (with the aforementioned edit) as contained at
the link above and to communicate such approval by our Work Team to the
Steering Committee.  We also agreed that those unable to attend today's
conference call have the ability to weigh in with their view/comments of
the draft Charter by response to this e-mail.  We would consider no
further comment to the draft Charter by end of day next Tuesday, April
28, as non-objection by a Work Team member to our communicating to the
Steering Committee our Work Team's approval of the draft Charter.  I
will also note that our approval of the draft Charter does not mean we
can not later change it.  It only means we've accepted it.

 

Our next call is scheduled for next Wednesday, April 29th at 16:00 UTC
which is 12:00 pm EST (note the one hour time change).  It will then go
back to a two week cycle at the same 16:00 UTC time.  Glen will send a
reminder for the call next week as she normally does and I will send a
brief agenda as well prior to the call.

 

I expect that in the meantime, there will be new e-mail thread for you
to be on the lookout pertaining to the duty separation document we've
been discussing.  For those not on the call today, I think you will be
able catch up on this status fairly quickly and I encourage you to
participate with your thoughts upon your review of it.

 

Ray