RE: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter

["Julie Hedlund" <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ray,

I'll be happy to make the change.

Thanks,

Julie
  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Ray Fassett
  Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:47 PM
  To: 'Ron Andruff'; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
  Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter


  Ron, I've read your friendly amendment a few times and see no substantive
change to the edit we approved.  It is accepted.  Julie can you please
perform the change on the wiki site.  Thank you.



  Ray




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
  Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 6:10 PM
  To: 'Ray Fassett'; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
  Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter



  Ray,



  I reread the Charter again and realized that we need to add a few more
words to our edit.  It now reads as follows:



  .  <Review> rules for the establishment of new constituencies within
stakeholder groups, while recognizing that differences exist between
stakeholder groups and constituencies.



  I suggest the following friendly amendment:



  .  <Review> the current specifications and recommend rules for the
establishment of new constituencies within stakeholder groups, while
recognizing that differences exist between stakeholder groups and
constituencies.



  Kind regards,



  RA



  Ronald N. Andruff

  RNA Partners, Inc.

  220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor

  New York, New York 10001



  www.rnapartners.com

  V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11

  F:  +1 212 481 2859




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ray Fassett
  Sent: 2009-04-23 13:43
  To: gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] Operations Work Team Draft Charter



  Hello Team, very productive teleconference call today, I think.  While our
group may be small, I believe we are speaking freely allowing the flow of
ideas to form into concepts.  As the Chair of this Work Team, I am very
pleased for this evolution and thank each one of you for enabling it.  Let's
keep it up.



  As a reminder, Julie has completed the one minor edit to our draft Charter
agreed to today by those on the call.  Here is the link:



  https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_work_team_draft_c
harter



  You will visibly see the minor edit (i.e. "before and after") in the 5th
bullet point under Section 1, Team Charter Goals.  For those of you not on
the call today, the reason we reached rough consensus for this minor change
is due to the fact that there are already rules for the establishment of new
constituencies thus we felt the task was more to "review" and provide any
recommendations rather "prepare".  So, again, a minor but accurate edit as
we saw it.



  With this said, those on the call today agreed by rough consensus to
approve the draft Charter (with the aforementioned edit) as contained at the
link above and to communicate such approval by our Work Team to the Steering
Committee.  We also agreed that those unable to attend today's conference
call have the ability to weigh in with their view/comments of the draft
Charter by response to this e-mail.  We would consider no further comment to
the draft Charter by end of day next Tuesday, April 28, as non-objection by
a Work Team member to our communicating to the Steering Committee our Work
Team's approval of the draft Charter.  I will also note that our approval of
the draft Charter does not mean we can not later change it.  It only means
we've accepted it.



  Our next call is scheduled for next Wednesday, April 29th at 16:00 UTC
which is 12:00 pm EST (note the one hour time change).  It will then go back
to a two week cycle at the same 16:00 UTC time.  Glen will send a reminder
for the call next week as she normally does and I will send a brief agenda
as well prior to the call.



  I expect that in the meantime, there will be new e-mail thread for you to
be on the lookout pertaining to the duty separation document we've been
discussing.  For those not on the call today, I think you will be able catch
up on this status fairly quickly and I encourage you to participate with
your thoughts upon your review of it.



  Ray