<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Time adjustment for next week's call
- To: "'Ray Fassett'" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Ops Work Team'" <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Time adjustment for next week's call
- From: "Tony Holmes" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 20:45:10 +0100
Ray
Sorry for not responding before but its only just become clear that I could
move the time forward, so I can go with either time now.
Regards
Tony
_____
From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ray Fassett
Sent: 03 August 2009 18:56
To: 'GNSO Ops Work Team'
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'
Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Time adjustment for next week's call
Reminder, please respond if this request for time change for this
Wednesday's call is do-able for you. Unless I hear otherwise by tomorrow,
we will keep the normally scheduled time of 16:00 UTC.
Ray
_____
From: Ray Fassett [mailto:ray@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:25 AM
To: 'GNSO Ops Work Team'
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'
Subject: Time adjustment for next week's call
All, Ron has requested moving our time for next week's call to 15:00 UTC
(i.e. up one hour from 16:00) due to a conflict he has. Can you respond if
this change can or can not work for you? For Ken, I know there will be
conflict due to the RyC bi-weekly call at the same time.
Ray
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|