<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-osc-ops] FW: [bc-gnso] GCOT request for input from CBUC members
- To: gnso-osc-ops <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: [bc-gnso] GCOT request for input from CBUC members
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:23:46 -0700
Dear Work Team Members,
Here is a response from Michael Castello.
Best regards,
Julie
------ Forwarded Message
From: Michael Castello <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Michael Castello <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:15:47 -0700
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] GCOT request for input from CBUC members
Hello Julie,
We answer: NO
Michael Castello
CEO/President
Castello Cities Internet Network, Inc.
http://www.ccin.com
michael@xxxxxxxx
--
Monday, August 3, 2009, 8:28:04 AM, you wrote:
Dear Members Please find below a mail (and attachment) from Ray Fassett, Chair
of the GNSO Council Operations Work Team Best wishes Gary
---------------------------------------- The GNSO Council Operations Work Team
(GCOT) is requesting feedback from you and your members with regards to the
attached document. While we are asking one question as noted below, all
comments are welcome as our goal is for broader community feedback at this
time. In this light, our aim is for individual feedback vs. formal
Constituency statement. Our request is to distribute to your members. All
replies should be to Julie Hedlund at julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx, assisting our
Work Team in an administrative position. Julie will then forward all comments
received to our Work Team discussion list. The Operating Steering Committee
GNSO Operations Work Team ("Work Team") has been tasked with determining
high-level operating principles for the GNSO. In line with this mandate, the
Work Team has been considering how to establish a stronger, more effective
GNSO. This document describes a Generic Name Supporting Organization with two
separate, functional bodies (as opposed to our existing single body known as
the Policy Council), which we think may achieve the goal stated above. THE
WORK TEAM WOULD LIKE TO STRESS THAT THIS PROPOSAL SHOULD NOT BE VIEWED AS A
FIRM RECOMMENDATION. NEITHER SHOULD IT BE ASSUMED THAT THERE IS CONSENSUS FOR
THIS APPROACH WITHIN THE WORK TEAM. We feel that it is appropriate to seek
broader input from the ICANN Community on an approach that would fundamentally
change the GNSO structure and working arrangements of the GNSO through the
separation of its core functions, i.e. creating separate bodies: one for policy
development management and one for the administration of the SO. THEREFORE, TO
BE CLEAR, THE WORK TEAM IS ASKING YOU ONE QUESTION ONLY: Do you think that the
establishment of a new, additional body to address specific responsibilities -
as described herein - would better serve the stakeholder groups that make up
the GNSO, or not? The feedback received from the ICANN Community will establish
the way forward for the Work Team regarding our work on this high-level GNSO
operating principle. Any additional comments or questions you may have are
welcomed. Please reply to: julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx We take this opportunity
to thank you in advance for providing our Work Team with this much needed
direction. Sincerely, Ray Fassett Chair GCOT 1-216-426-1500 Ext 3
------ End of Forwarded Message
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|