[gnso-osc-ops] FW: GCOT request for input

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Work Team members,

Here is a response I received from Carolyn Hoover.  I also will include this in 
the table I am preparing to summarize comments.

Best,

Julie

------ Forwarded Message
From: "Hoover, Carolyn" <CHoover@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:54:14 -0700
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: GCOT request for input

Dear Julie,
Ray Fassett of the Registry Constituency had requested that each registry 
respond to you directly on this question:
Do you think that the establishment of a new, additional body to address 
specific responsibilities - as described herein - would better serve the 
stakeholder groups that make up the GNSO, or not?

As the representative of the .coop Sponsor - dotCooperation LLC - my response 
would be - No.  I believe the addition of another body would create confusion 
and difficulties in deciding which groups would have "jurisdiction" over a 
particular issue.  In any case, many issues cross the lines between the two 
proposed groups and this split would serve to further paralyze action by the 
GNSO - which is already slow enough.

Yours in cooperation,

Carolyn T. Hoover
Chief Executive Officer
DotCooperation LLC
1401 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
USA
---------------------------------
T: +1.202.383.5453
F: +1.202.347.1968
E: choover@xxxxxxxxxxxx
W: http://www.coop <http://www.coop>


------ End of Forwarded Message