ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-ops]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: GNSO Council Operations Work Team Conference Details / 30 September at 1600 UTC

  • To: Ray Fassett <ray@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: GNSO Council Operations Work Team Conference Details / 30 September at 1600 UTC
  • From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:33:02 -0400


Ray,

I've a concern about abstentions being counted as votes against. Where a person with standing to vote is aware of a conflict, and Bruce has always been a good example of that, and the issue is known to be close, the assignment of the non-vote to a position, affirmative or negative, on the issue, makes acting on that possibly private knowledge of conflict less likely, as the act of abstention may have dispositive outcome rather than no outcome.

Suppose there are 15 persons with standing to vote, and the issue before them is "shall 8 of you benefit by this vote", and all 8 abstain. The outcome must, under the "abstention == no" rule, be that the issue fails to attract 8 "yes" votes. A 7 to 0 vote becomes a 7 to 8 result.

Eric



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy