<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of interest
- To: "'Ray Fassett'" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of interest
- From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:52:22 -0400
Ray and all,
As you may recall, I sit on the OSC as well, so I had suggested that the OSC
make this recommendation to the GNSO when forwarding the revised OP on to
them. Philip has chosen to send this back to us for reasons I don't
understand. That being the case, I would suggest that we ask staff to
incorporate this recommendation as a footnote and send it back to the OSC.
I do NOT think that this is an issue for further discussion within the team,
unless other Work Team members think differently.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
President
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10001
+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11
_____
From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ray Fassett
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 8:05 AM
To: gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures -
section 5 statements of interest
Team, fyi below.
_____
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:43 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Ray Fassett'
Subject: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of
interest
Indeed I support Steve's additional thought re a list of contractors.
Ray, please add to your revised section 5.
Philip
--------------------------
A related issue to consider: if this system is to work as proposed, there
needs to be an authoritative, current and publicly available list of all
"entities with which ICANN has a transaction, contract, or other arrangement
(e.g. Registries, Registrars, Consultants,etc)." Otherwise, a person who
has a "compensation arrangement" with such an entity on an issue totally
unrelated to ICANN might well be unaware that this is a relationship which
s/he is supposed to disclose. I don't think such a list exists today, is
ICANN in a position to prepare, maintain and post it?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|