<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: Potential Agenda Items For This Week's GCOT Call
- To: Ray Fassett <ray@xxxxxxxxx>, "'gnso-osc-ops'" <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: Potential Agenda Items For This Week's GCOT Call
- From: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:41:12 -0700
Ray and all,
With regard to the issue of SOIs for staff, we understand that a question has
arisen as to the need for ICANN staff (including those serving as ICANN
contractors) who are staffing GNSO Working Groups to produce statements of
interest as contemplated under the operating rules and procedures.
It is ICANN staff's view, in consultation with the General Counsel's office,
that Statements of Interest are required of participants in GNSO processes;
staff are not "participants." Staff are assigned to and complete work in
support of the GNSO groups on behalf of ICANN. While staff may offer advice and
support to the GNSO processes, this is separate from the participation of the
GNSO membership and other volunteers, who are expected to make the broader
decisions on policy development and other issues before the GNSO.
We look forward to today's call. Thanks! Liz
From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ray Fassett
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:08 AM
To: 'gnso-osc-ops'
Cc: Julie Hedlund; Robert Hoggarth; 'Ken Bour'
Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] FW: Potential Agenda Items For This Week's GCOT Call
I have added some thoughts for us to consider for the agenda today as follows:
* Discuss inquiry regarding SOIs for staff (resolve need)
I think we've made a legitimate distinction of purpose in the RoP with regards
to Conflicts of Interest vs. Statements of Interest. Are ICANN staff members
(employees and contracted consultants) obligated to ICANN's Conflict of
Interest policy?
* Discuss list of entities with which ICANN has a transaction, contract, or
other arrangement (confirm OGC advice and resolve need)
I believe this was a question/issue originally raised by Steve Metalitz. The
advice we gave as a WT was a recommendation to the OSC for staff to review the
feasibility of compiling and maintaining such a list, and left at the
discretion of the OSC whether they wanted to recommend to the Council to
approve this section in parallel of this work was taking place. Of course it
was not recommended by the OSC to approve in parallel to this request to staff.
So my question is this: Has staff looked at the issue of compiling and
maintaining a list and informing us that this is not feasible?
* Discuss Work Team member concerns about available forms for SOIs and DOIs
(resolve info collection process)
I think the spirit of the WT, by my recollection, was for efficiencies and ease
of use. We talked about an online submission form process for these objectives
as I recall.
* Confirm need for written DOIs (address Councilor concerns about compliance
burdens)
I need to understand the issues here better.
* Discuss potential Work team recommendations regarding Council meeting
process questions (e.g., what should actually be required on each call re:
polling)
I think there can be logical methods to steam line this.
* Staff status report on community discussion/implementation of new voting
abstention procedures
I admit to hearing issues of complexity but not, in my view, enough to offset
the purpose as we thought it out.
From: Ray Fassett [mailto:ray@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 9:48 PM
To: 'gnso-osc-ops'
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Ken Bour'; 'robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx';
'Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx'; 'Glen@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: FW: Potential Agenda Items For This Week's GCOT Call
Working with staff, I think this is an appropriate starting point for our WT
call this Wednesday, please see below.
Ray
Proposed Draft GCOT Agenda Items Regarding GNSO Statements of
Interests/Declarations of Interests:
* Discuss inquiry regarding SOIs for staff (resolve need)
* Discuss list of entities with which ICANN has a transaction, contract, or
other arrangement (confirm OGC advice and resolve need)
* Discuss Work Team member concerns about available forms for SOIs and DOIs
(resolve info collection process)
* Confirm need for written DOIs (address Councilor concerns about compliance
burdens)
* Discuss potential Work team recommendations regarding Council meeting
process questions (e.g., what should actually be required on each call re:
polling)
* Staff status report on community discussion/implementation of new voting
abstention procedures
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|