<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-osc-ops] RE: [gnso-osc] RE: MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
- To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: [gnso-osc] RE: MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
- From: "Ray Fassett" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:09:19 -0500
This answers it for me. The edits Wolf-Ulrich is correcting to the DOI
language occurred at the OSC level, not the GCOT level.
Ray
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:07 AM
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ray@xxxxxxxxx; stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] RE: MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS
PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
Wolf-Ulrich,
indeed OSC approval included the revised DOI though to be honest there was
little discussion about it.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|