ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions

  • To: <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
  • From: "Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:20:05 +0100

My intention was to ensure the closest cooperation between Work Teams
and SCs as possible in order to avoid unnessessary rediscussion on two
levels.
This could also be achieved if you add to the SC-charters (here: OSC)
under "Other Participants in the OSC":

*       

        Chair person of each Work Team

 
Best regards
Wolf



  _____  

Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2008 23:10
An: Robert Hoggarth; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter -
Clean and Redline Versions


I must have missed that.
 
Chuck


  _____  

From: Robert Hoggarth [mailto:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 4:08 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter -
Clean and Redline Versions



Thanks, Chuck. I'll double check that.
Wolf added the chair comment as an edit/comment on the wiki back during
the Summer for all three work teams.
RobH



  _____  

From: Gomes, Chuck 
To: Robert Hoggarth; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Fri Dec 12 12:39:08 2008
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter -
Clean and Redline Versions 




Thanks Rob.  The redline version appears to end in the middle of the
first sentence of Section IV.
 
At the end of Section IV, item 7 says, "The chair of the team should be
someone from the associated steering committing."  Where did this come
from?  I have not particular objection to someone from the OSC being
chair, but I see no reason to have that restriction.
 
Under Decision Making, I am not sure "full consensus of the members"
process" will work for work teams, but I am comfortable with the work
teams making a recommendation in that regard.  I suggesst we leave Rob's
comment in the draft as guidance for the work team.
 
In Section VII, it might be good to add potential team projects for each
of the other goals listed in Section II, even if we only list the name
of the project with no detail.
 
Finally, I suggest we add a section called something like "Work Team
Rules" and include the rules we have been using for WGs to the extent
that they fit.
 
We can discuss the above in our meeting Monday.
 
Chuck


  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 12:45 PM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter - Clean
and Redline Versions


Dear OSC Members:

Pursuant to my previous message, attached please find the clean and
red-line versions of the Draft Charter for the Communications Work Team.

Look forward to talking with you all on Monday.

Best regards,

Rob Hoggarth 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy