<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc] Latest Draft Invitation and Work Team Rules
- To: "Robert Hoggarth" <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Latest Draft Invitation and Work Team Rules
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:42:55 -0500
Thanks Rob. The draft invitation looks very good to me.
Regarding the Work Team Rules:
*
I recommend that the edit I suggested in my first comment be made.
*
That we add a section regarding Statements of Interest; I think we can
adapt what the PPSC has done in this regard.
*
Accept all edits, make any formatting edits needed, and send a clean
copy to the OSC list for final approval.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:11 PM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] Latest Draft Invitation and Work Team Rules
Thank you all for the fast and very helpful comments on the draft
invite today. I have cleaned up the latest version and am re-circulating a
clean copy that reflects the growing view that Wolf-Ulrich's two-part approach
would work well. I think it is important to have background information
available to potential volunteers who are not intimately familiar with the
process to date. Please also respond to Olga's suggestions as well.
Also, with all the draft document versions going back and forth, please
remember to review and comment on the Draft Work Team Rules. I have
re-attached the latest version of that document that Wolf-Ulrich commented on
yesterday. So far only Philip, Wolf-Ulrich, Stephane and Chuck have commented
on that document. Once we get closure on the rules, we can incorporate them
back into the draft team charters, get further committee feedback, and then
re-post the new draft charter versions to the wiki.
Thank you all for your continued focus and commitment to this effort!
Best regards,
Rob Hoggarth
On 12/17/08 11:24 AM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I like the new message.
Is this message going to be widely spreaded? If so, it could be
convenient to add at the end a brief paragraph about the expected bacground or
experience that volunteers may have in order to participate actively.
Also areference to an expected amount of dedicated hours could
be useful to include.
Thanks Robert and Wolf for drafting the document.
Regards
Olga
2008/12/17 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Makes sense Wolf.
Let's discuss the costs issue later if needed.
Chuck
________________________________
From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 10:20 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx;
gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] Draft
Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Sorry Stéphane and Chuck,
that's not the way to go. Before we discuss
potential kinds of incentives (I could imagine a variety of) we should reach a
harmonized view about
- whether it is worth or not to offer
incentives (my opinion is: yes but only in case we fail in the first call for
volunteers)
- that ICANN should bear related costs (do we
need Board approval for that?)
Let's start with a non-incentive call and see
what happens.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Deutsche Telekom AG
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 140
D - 53113 Bonn
+49 2244 873999 (Tel.)
+49 2151 5300 5206 (PC-Fax)
+49 151 1452 5867 (Mobil)
http://www.telekom.com
<http://www.telekom.com/>
Deutsche Telekom AG
Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner
(Vorsitzender)
Vorstand: René Obermann (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Karl-Gerhard Eick (stellvertretender
Vorsitzender)
Hamid Akhavan, Manfred Balz, Reinhard Clemens,
Timotheus Höttges, Thomas Sattelberger
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 6794
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn
WEEE-Reg.-Nr.: DE50478376
________________________________
Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2008 14:16
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich;
robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] Draft
Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Wolf,
I like having the invitation right up front.
Good idea.
Like Stephan, I am curious about what
incentives we could offer.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
[mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008
5:39 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck;
robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] Draft
Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Trying to make the announcement more
effective I rearranged the proposal (Main page + background information) as
attached. That's no content change, just an communication improvement,
hopefully.
BTW since finding volunteers seems to
be the real challenge, why shouldn't we - in worst case only - think about
incentives?
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2008
00:53
An: Robert Hoggarth; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] Draft
Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Thanks Rob (and probably Liz and Ken
too). To get discussion going, I proposed some edits and inserted some
comments that are highlighted in the attached file. To minimize confusion, I
suggest that everyone use the attached version, understanding that you should
feel free to disagree with my suggestions and suggest new changes.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:10 PM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] Draft
Invitation-Announcement To Join Work Teams
Dear OSC Members:
Pursuant to your discussion on
yesterday's call, attached please find a draft announcement seeking volunteers
for the GNSO "Improvements" Implementation Work Teams. The announcement is
currently designed for all five GNSO work teams (three OSC teams and two PPSC
teams).
Decision/feedback points include:
* General edits and comments
regarding form, style and text;
* Announcement methodology - is
the group OK with email announcement as well as ICANN web site announcement?
* Contact points - left blank in
the draft, to whom do you think expressions of interest should be directed?
* Statements of Interest - do
you think these are appropriate for work teams?
Please direct all comments to the
entire list.
Best regards,
Rob Hoggarth
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|