Re: [gnso-osc] FW: GNSO Operating Procedures Final Drafts

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Avri. Yes, I think people who understand the process like we do won't
have any need for any further explanation but, as I pointed out and you seem
to agree, the doc would be much easier to grasp for the non ICANN insiders
if this was explicitly stated in it.

Once again, just a small thing but one which may help make the doc more
readable.

Stéphane


Le 13/09/09 22:07, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> Hi,
> 
> quick answer(not that this help the doc in itself)
> 
> 100% in contracted parties house + 100% in non-contracted parties
> house = maximum of 200 possible score.
> 
> a.
> 
> On 13 Sep 2009, at 20:53, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Chuck,
>> 
>> Just one small comment on article 4.1.b.iii which seems unclear to
>> me in the way it¹s written. It makes it hard for anyone not well
>> versed in the voting system to understand where the 200 score comes
>> from.
>> 
>> Otherwise the document looks fine.
>> 
>> Stéphane
> 
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature