[gnso-osc] FW: GNSO Operating Procedures Final Drafts
Thanks Ray, I think that makes it a lot clearer. Stéphane Le 13/09/09 23:50, « Ray Fassett » <ray@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > Does the language below make things clearer? > > iii. The leading candidate will be defined as the one with the highest > score. The score will be determined by adding together the voting > percentages attained from each house. The highest percentage attainable in > each house is 100. Thus the maximum score a candidate can achieve is 200 as > a result of attaining 100% of the votes from the contracted party house and > 100% from the non-contracted party house (100% + 100% = score of 200). > > Ray > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 4:16 PM > To: Avri Doria; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: Ray Fassett > Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] FW: GNSO Operating Procedures Final Drafts > Importance: High > > Thanks Avri. Yes, I think people who understand the process like we do won't > have any need for any further explanation but, as I pointed out and you seem > to agree, the doc would be much easier to grasp for the non ICANN insiders > if this was explicitly stated in it. > > Once again, just a small thing but one which may help make the doc more > readable. > > Stéphane > > > Le 13/09/09 22:07, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit : > >> >> Hi, >> >> quick answer(not that this help the doc in itself) >> >> 100% in contracted parties house + 100% in non-contracted parties >> house = maximum of 200 possible score. >> >> a. >> >> On 13 Sep 2009, at 20:53, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote: >> >>> Thanks Chuck, >>> >>> Just one small comment on article 4.1.b.iii which seems unclear to >>> me in the way it¹s written. It makes it hard for anyone not well >>> versed in the voting system to understand where the 200 score comes >>> from. >>> >>> Otherwise the document looks fine. >>> >>> Stéphane >> >> > > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|