ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc] Final response to the CCT

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Final response to the CCT
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:21:37 -0500

Avri/Robin,
 
I encourage you to respond to Philip's clarification and suggestion.
 
Chuck


  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 6:59 AM
To: Philip Sheppard
Cc: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] Final response to the CCT




In other words: my recommendation was that there is no need for an
additional
work item for the GNSO given the existence of excellent set of standards
from
the Ombudsman office. http://www.icann.org/en/transparency 
A better reference would be a simple recommendation for the GNSO council to
formally adopt these standards.



This does seem to make a lot of sense.

Thanks,

Stéphane

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy