<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc] OSC Chair Position
- To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] OSC Chair Position
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:28:33 -0500
Hi,
While I think having a v-chair serve in the role is less deleterious then
having a chair serve, I still do not think of it as an optimum solution.
I personally think that after the membership of the OSC has been reconfirmed by
al the constituency/stakeholder groups that group of people should try to
figure this out. And if the Council v-chair is the only volunteer then so be
it - though I am afraid that no one will volunteer once the v-chair has
volunteered for fear of alienating that v-chair. And while I have no problem
with any of the individuals involved, I think it is a bad practice as it
prevents other leaders from emerging.
I never knew that Chuck was only an interim chair - was there a continuing
attempt to find a non-interim chair? To recruit one would have been an
interim chair's responsibility - otherwise people would have felt they were
going up against the chair. If that interim responsibility is to fall on the
v-chair now, that seems ok, a long as it really is an interim responsibility
and Stéphane will undertake that responsibility with a view to finding a
non-interim chair.
a.
On 26 Dec 2009, at 08:30, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> I approached Chuck a few days ago letting him know that if being chair of the
> OSC was turning out to be too heavy a load in addition to his duties as chair
> of the Council, I would be happy to step in and take over as chair of the OSC
> on an interim basis.
>
> As a reminder, Chuck started off as interim chair of the OSC and ended up
> staying chair because no-one else volunteered to hold that role. My logic
> therefore was that, if the load on Chuck was now too much (which seemed
> likely to me with Council duties), a "quick fix" was another interim chair
> until the group voted for a permanent one.
>
> I am therefore very much in favor of doing what Chuck suggests, and am happy
> to step in as interim if that helps get things moving and if the group is
> happy with that.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
> Le 24 déc. 2009 à 20:20, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
>
>>
>> Thanks for getting the discussion started Avri.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 1:24 PM
>>> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] OSC Chair Position
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for opening this up for discussion.
>>>
>>> As you probably know, I have always been concerned about
>>> Chairs of subgroups 'reporting' to themselves as Chairs of
>>> the chartering body. I tend to think that it confuses the
>>> ability of the person to both be objective and neutral in the
>>> chartering group and strongly represent their chartered
>>> group. As chair of the OSC you are charged with representing,
>>> as strongly as possible, the needs and decisions of the OSC,
>>> while on the other hand as Chair of the Council you are
>>> required to handle the requests of all subgroups in a neutral
>>> and objective manner. It is difficult to be both a strong
>>> advocate of a group and neutral about that group at the same
>>> time. I must admit, I have the same concerns for v-chairs
>>> and believe that the chairs/v-chairs (and often even the
>>> members) of the chartering groups should not chair subgroups
>>> except in emergency situations and then only briefly.
>>>
>>> I also think that in the effort to spread the responsibility
>>> around among the stakeholder groups, it is important to reach
>>> out and to get a diverse group of leaders whenever possible.
>>>
>>> a.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24 Dec 2009, at 11:38, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>>
>>>> As all of you know, I was elected OSC chair when I was
>>> Council Vice Chair. It has been brought to my attention that
>>> it might be worth considering whether we should revisit the
>>> OSC chair role now that I am Council Chair. I am certainly
>>> open to that and would welcome your thoughts in that regard.
>>>>
>>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|