Re: [gnso-osc] FW: CCT Report II
It is entirely inappropriate for this provision to remain in this document given the stated lack of consensus on it. This working group cannot just ignore NCSG's stated objection and continue to keep the provision in the consensus document when there is, in fact, no consensus behind it. Robin On Mar 18, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Avri Doria wrote: I am reminded that the NCSG did object to this in an earlier version. http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-osc/msg00267.htmlThe fact that it remains, may be more of a problem then I originally felt.a. On 18 Mar 2010, at 15:06, Avri Doria wrote:Hi,With the exception of the section on civilty i am fine with the document.I do not think discussions or recommendations on civility belongs in the document and see it as just a pean to the ombudsman. I think civility is something that is taught by example and not by words, proclamations and board resolutions. But since no one from the NCSG participated in the group and I know I am in a minority on this issue, I am just pointing it out and not objecting to the document on this basis.I agree with passing it on. a. On 18 Mar 2010, at 13:53, Ken Stubbs wrote:Ken Stubbs wrote: I agree with Ron here and support this going fwd to the council On 3/18/2010 12:04 PM, Ron Andruff wrote:I, too, support this document going forward to Council. Your comments within the document vis-à-vis OSC review work for me, Chuck.Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff President RNA Partners, Inc. 220 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10001 + 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, ChuckSent: Monday, March 15, 2010 5:19 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] FW: CCT Report IITo get discussion going on this, I attached a version of this document with my comments highlighted. As I say in my first comment, this is a very good report and my impression is that the OSC could make some minor modifications of it and it could be ready to go.ChuckFrom: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, ChuckSent: Friday, March 12, 2010 4:09 PM To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [gnso-osc] FW: CCT Report IIAs promised, here is Section II of the CCT Recommendations for review and consideration by the OSC.Chuck From: Mason Cole [mailto:masonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 7:22 PM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: Ken Bour; julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx; Scott Pinzon Subject: CCT Report II Chuck –I’m pleased to forward the second part of the CCT’s recommendations on communications and coordination. The CCT met last week to review the final draft and we’re ready to turn it over to the OSC for consideration.I’m happy to discuss this with you in Reston at the venue there.Special thanks to Ken, Julie and Scott, all of whom did a wonderful job supporting this team.Thanks – Mason IP JUSTICE Robin Gross, Executive Director 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|