ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of interest

  • To: "'Ray Fassett'" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of interest
  • From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:06:04 +0200

Ray,
I would like to request that you agree and make these changes and resubmit to
the OSC.
It seems there may be some thinking through and I believe that should be at the
team level.
Please base changes on the attached.
In view of these changes the OSC should note the comment period is now
re-established to April 16.
We will target the May Council meeting now not April.
Philip
 

  _____  

From: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 11:47 PM
To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Final OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5
statements of interest


Of course my reference in the next to last paragraph should be to items 1, 4 and
5, not 1,2, and 5.  Sorry about that.  
 
 

  _____  

From: Metalitz, Steven 
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 5:39 PM
To: 'Philip Sheppard'; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Final OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5
statements of interest


I have a few concerns about this document.  
 
First, I suggest that "investment interest" be defined to exclude ownership of a
de minimis number of shares in a publicly traded company.  Otherwise, anyone who
neglected to mention (or perhaps even to know) that s/he owned a share of
Microsoft, Google (both accredited registrars) or Verisign (among others) might
run afoul of section 5.3.3.3.i.  
 
Second,  we need to recognize that there will be circumstances in which a
requirement (under section 5.3.3.3.ii) to disclose that (for example) a lawyer
represents Google in a matter totally unrelated to anything in the ICANN purview
could present a problem or at least a considerable delay in getting permission
to disclose the representation.  I suppose these could be treated as an
"extenuating circumstance" under 5.5.1 and I do not have an amendment to propose
at this point but just wanted to flag the problem.  
 
Third, the requirement to disclose "potential ... investment interest in  or
compensation arrangement with...." contracted parties (section 5.3.3.3.iii) will
need to be administered in a common-sense manner.  Potentially, almost anything
could happen.  A potential that is concrete and imminent ought to be
distinguished from the broader range of potential occurrences.  I hope we can
assume common sense but that assumption is not always well founded.  
 
Fourth, is the reference to "nomination/selection as a work team member" in
section 5.3.3.5.v still relevant now that participation in many of the GNSO
entities is completely self-selected, with no other nomination or selection
process?  Shouldn't this be changed to "participation"?  
 
Fifth, I believe the reference to "Declarations of Interest" in section 5.2.1
should be changed to "Disclosures of Interest" which is the term used throughout
the rest of the document.  
 
In view of where this stands in the process,  I won't press the second or third
point above, but ask that the simple amendments proposed in 1, 2, and 5 above be
made before the document is passed to the Council. I have also asked my
constituency leadership for any further input they can provide by the Sunday
deadline. 
 
In my defense, I will note that the deadline for comments on this document was
the 16th until it was accelerated today to the 11th.   I would love to have the
luxury of attending to these documents as soon as I receive them but the nature
of the ICANN public comment decathlon does not permit that and I have no choice
but to deal with these roughly in the order of their impending deadlines.   
 
Steve Metalitz

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Philip Sheppard
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 5:05 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] Final OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of
interest


Dear OSC members,
in view of Council's deadline for their next meeting and the absence of further
comments from the OSC I am bringing forward the end of our review period to 11
April.
 
Please find attached a proposed final OSC approved version of the GCOT teams
work on section 5 of the GNSO operating procedures manual dealing with
statements of interest.
The final version includes the OSC clarifications proposed by Philip and Chuck.
 
In the absence of a chorus of disapproval I will submit the attached to Council
on Monday 12 April.
 
Philip
OSC Chair
 
 <http://www.aim.be/> 

Attachment: GNSO rules section 5.0 OSC pending 4-2010.doc
Description: MS-Word document



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy