RE: [gnso-osc] GCOT Ops Section 5 - disclosure of interest

["Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>]

OK, with the understanding that OSC recommends that the new provisions
not become operative until the issues regarding the list are resolved.
I believe this is consistent with the views expressed by Ray Fassett.  

Steve  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 9:20 AM
To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] GCOT Ops Section 5 - disclosure of interest


I am fine with this Philip except I suggest we say "request ICANN Staff"
instead of "direct ICANN Staff", which I am sure you intended anyway.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:09 AM
> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-osc] GCOT Ops Section 5 - disclosure of interest
> 
> Dear OSC,
> 
> In view of the dialogue on this section of the GNSO operating 
> procedures manual I propose the following.
> We adopt the attached text as the OSC (this has been through our 10
day
> adoption period).
> 
> We take up the reply from GCOT Chair Ray to Steve's point about a list

> with the following suggestion to Council chair Chuck.
> 
> The OSC recommends that Council direct ICANN Staff to explore a means 
> and mechanism to create and maintain a list of all "entities with
which
> ICANN has a transaction, contract, or other arrangement (e.g.
> Registries, Registrars, Consultants,etc)." with appropriate 
> considerations of privacy by XX date.
> 
> Steve, Chuck
> let me know if you support this outcome.
> 
> Philip