<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1 constituencies
- To: Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1 constituencies
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 07:39:30 -0700
Chuck,
I just checked with Ken and that is his thought as well (the combined
motion). He is working on a first draft.
Thanks,
Julie
On 6/9/10 10:31 AM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks Julie. Please coordinate with Ken because he had already drafted
> one motion for the GCOT, and I think one motion might cover both the
> GCOT and CSG recommendations.
>
> Chuck
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 10:17 AM
>> To: Philip Sheppard; Gomes, Chuck
>> Cc: <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1
>> constituencies
>>
>> Chuck and Philip,
>>
>> I will take on the task to write up a draft motion.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Julie
>>
>>
>> On 6/9/10 10:07 AM, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Good idea
>>>
>>> Philip Sheppard
>>> AIM
>>> www.aim.be
>>>
>>> On 9 Jun 2010, at 15:33, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if it would be wise to put a motion on the table in time
>> for
>>>> the 23 June Council meeting in Brussels to open a 21-day comment
>>>> period
>>>> on these recommendations as well as the rest of the GCOT GNSO
>>>> procedures
>>>> recommendations. If the OSC doesn't approve the recommendations on
>> 19
>>>> June, we could drop the motion. If we do approve them, we could
> get
>>>> the
>>>> 21-day comment period started sooner and move to closer on these
>>>> issues
>>>> sooner.
>>>>
>>>> Would it make sense to have Julie or Ken draft a motion in that
>>>> regard?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Chuck
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx]
> On
>>>>> Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 4:14 AM
>>>>> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1
>>>>> constituencies
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear OSC members,
>>>>> FOR REVIEW AND ADOPTION by June 19
>>>>> Please find attached a report from the Constituency Stakeholder
>> Group
>>>>> (CSG).
>>>>> The report is task one of their two tasks.
>>>>>
>>>>> It includes recommendations on three sub-tasks:
>>>>> a) Common Operating Principles for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and
>>>>> Constituencies
>>>>> b) Participation Guidelines for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and
>>>>> Constituencies
>>>>> c) GNSO Database of Community Members
>>>>>
>>>>> There is also a substantial minority report with a more
> fundamental
>>>>> approach.
>>>>>
>>>>> In view of the report's length (20 pages) and the upcoming meeting
>> of
>>>>> the OSC on June 19 in Brussels, I propose starting our discussion
>>>>> period today June 1 with a view to adoption at the June 19
> meeting.
>>>>> It
>>>>> would help therefore if any issues you wish to raise, are made by
>> e-
>>>>> mail in advance of June 19.
>>>>> Many thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Philip
>>>>> Chair OSC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|