<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1 constituencies
- To: "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1 constituencies
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:31:51 -0400
Thanks Julie. Please coordinate with Ken because he had already drafted
one motion for the GCOT, and I think one motion might cover both the
GCOT and CSG recommendations.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 10:17 AM
> To: Philip Sheppard; Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1
> constituencies
>
> Chuck and Philip,
>
> I will take on the task to write up a draft motion.
>
> Thanks,
> Julie
>
>
> On 6/9/10 10:07 AM, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > Good idea
> >
> > Philip Sheppard
> > AIM
> > www.aim.be
> >
> > On 9 Jun 2010, at 15:33, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I wonder if it would be wise to put a motion on the table in time
> for
> >> the 23 June Council meeting in Brussels to open a 21-day comment
> >> period
> >> on these recommendations as well as the rest of the GCOT GNSO
> >> procedures
> >> recommendations. If the OSC doesn't approve the recommendations on
> 19
> >> June, we could drop the motion. If we do approve them, we could
get
> >> the
> >> 21-day comment period started sooner and move to closer on these
> >> issues
> >> sooner.
> >>
> >> Would it make sense to have Julie or Ken draft a motion in that
> >> regard?
> >>
> >>
> >> Chuck
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx]
On
> >>> Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 4:14 AM
> >>> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: [gnso-osc] For adoption June 19 - CSG report task 1
> >>> constituencies
> >>>
> >>> Dear OSC members,
> >>> FOR REVIEW AND ADOPTION by June 19
> >>> Please find attached a report from the Constituency Stakeholder
> Group
> >>> (CSG).
> >>> The report is task one of their two tasks.
> >>>
> >>> It includes recommendations on three sub-tasks:
> >>> a) Common Operating Principles for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and
> >>> Constituencies
> >>> b) Participation Guidelines for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and
> >>> Constituencies
> >>> c) GNSO Database of Community Members
> >>>
> >>> There is also a substantial minority report with a more
fundamental
> >>> approach.
> >>>
> >>> In view of the report's length (20 pages) and the upcoming meeting
> of
> >>> the OSC on June 19 in Brussels, I propose starting our discussion
> >>> period today June 1 with a view to adoption at the June 19
meeting.
> >>> It
> >>> would help therefore if any issues you wish to raise, are made by
> e-
> >>> mail in advance of June 19.
> >>> Many thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Philip
> >>> Chair OSC
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|