RE: [gnso-osc] GCOT recommendations - SOI - adoption by October 31
Chuck, Philip, please find the attached updated red-line document per your good format suggestions below. I have changed/added comments. With regards to the footnote, there is only one. Each should have been "3" and somehow got lost in the isolation of this section. The one footnote contained in the document is for both footnotes referenced, 1 & 3. Ray -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:43 AM To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] GCOT recommendations - SOI - adoption by October 31 I first of all want to thank the GCOT for their relatively quick work on this. Second, I want to suggest some format improvements to the redline version before we forward final recommendations to the Council: 1) use the MS Word comment function for inserting explanations so that they are separate from the main text; 2) accept all formatting edits so the only redline edits shown are the actual text changes. Third, regarding Section 5.3.3: - There is a footnote number next to the Section title but I can't find the footnote. - Unless I missed it, there is no explanation for why significant text was deleted. It would be helpful to have be told the rationale. Hopefully we could request that right away so that we can still achieve the 31 October goal. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Philip Sheppard > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:23 AM > To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: [gnso-osc] GCOT recommendations - SOI - adoption by October 31 > > Fellow OSC members, > please find attached a revised recommendation on statements of interest > from the GCOT team chaired by Ray Fassett. > It is revised based on input earlier from the Council. > Let me have your comments with a view to OSC adoption by October 31. > > After which, assuming a positive reception, we will re-send it to the > GNSO Council. > > There is both a red-line and clean version. The red-line version has a > brief explanatory comment for each edit. In summary the changes are: > 1. To clarify that declarations of interest are not to be written > documents > 2. To exempt ICANN staff personnel from the requirement of > completing > statements of interest (upon condition as stated) > 3. To simplify the questions pertaining to the statement of > interest form > while keeping to their intent (note this is section 5.3.3 originally > not adopted by the Council that we hope now will be as a result of > these edits, assuming approved by the OSC.) > 4. To remove the condition that participants are to be > individually polled > by the Chair for updates to their disclosure of interest due to > feedback we've received relative to the inefficiency of this condition > in practice. > > Philip > OSC Chair > > > Attachment:
GNSO Operating Procedures v2 Section 5 Proposed Revisions 15 Oct 2010 redline.docx
|