RE: [gnso-osc] GCOT recommendations - SOI - adoption by October 31

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Very much appreciated Ray.  Thanks.

I think this is beneficial for the OSC and will be very helpful to the
Council as well.

With that said, I support the recommended changes.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Fassett [mailto:ray@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 12:06 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Philip Sheppard'; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] GCOT recommendations - SOI - adoption by
> October 31
> 
> Chuck, Philip, please find the attached updated red-line document per
> your good format suggestions below.  I have changed/added comments.
> With regards to the footnote, there is only one.  Each should have
been
> "3" and somehow got lost in the isolation of this section.  The one
> footnote contained in the document is for both footnotes referenced, 1
> & 3.
> 
> Ray
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:43 AM
> To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] GCOT recommendations - SOI - adoption by
> October 31
> 
> 
> I first of all want to thank the GCOT for their relatively quick work
> on this.
> 
> Second, I want to suggest some format improvements to the redline
> version before we forward final recommendations to the Council: 1) use
> the MS Word comment function for inserting explanations so that they
> are separate from the main text; 2) accept all formatting edits so the
> only redline edits shown are the actual text changes.
> 
> Third, regarding Section 5.3.3:
> 
>       - There is a footnote number next to the Section title but I
> can't find the footnote.
> 
>       - Unless I missed it, there is no explanation for why
significant
> text was deleted. It would be helpful to have be told the rationale.
> Hopefully we could request that right away so that we can still
achieve
> the 31 October goal.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:23 AM
> > To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-osc] GCOT recommendations - SOI - adoption by October
> 31
> >
> > Fellow OSC members,
> > please find attached a revised recommendation on statements of
> interest
> > from the GCOT team chaired by Ray Fassett.
> > It is revised based on input earlier from the Council.
> > Let me have your comments with a view to OSC adoption by October 31.
> >
> > After which, assuming a positive reception, we will re-send it to
the
> > GNSO Council.
> >
> > There is both a red-line and clean version.  The red-line version
has
> a
> > brief explanatory comment for each edit.  In summary the changes
are:
> > 1.      To clarify that declarations of interest are not to be
> written
> > documents
> > 2.      To exempt ICANN staff personnel from the requirement of
> > completing
> > statements of interest (upon condition as stated)
> > 3.      To simplify the questions pertaining to the statement of
> > interest form
> > while keeping to their intent (note this is section 5.3.3 originally
> > not adopted by the Council that we hope now will be as a result of
> > these edits, assuming approved by the OSC.)
> > 4.      To remove the condition that participants are to be
> > individually polled
> > by the Chair for updates to their disclosure of interest due to
> > feedback we've received relative to the inefficiency of this
> condition
> > in practice.
> >
> > Philip
> > OSC Chair
> >
> >
> >