ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc] RE: MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS

  • To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] RE: MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
  • From: "Ray Fassett" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:09:19 -0500

This answers it for me.  The edits Wolf-Ulrich is correcting to the DOI
language occurred at the OSC level, not the GCOT level.

 

Ray

 

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 9:07 AM
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ray@xxxxxxxxx; stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] RE: MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS
PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS

 

Wolf-Ulrich,

indeed OSC approval included the revised DOI though to be honest there was
little discussion about it.

 

Philip

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy