Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - approval by April 15 - v3

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Very well summarized, Philip. I agree that this has been a useful debate with 
the positive result being that everyone on this list now understands the 
nuances the GCOT wrestled with and, more importantly,  consensus being found on 
this critical issue. 

Kind regards, 

RA 

________________________________________
Ron Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.rnapartners.com

-----Original Message-----
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Sender: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:34:51 
To: <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures -  proxy vote - approval by April 
15 - v3

Thanks for all the useful debate.
In light of this I propose a revision of the earlier simplification.
 
This:
- adds even more to simplification (Avri, Chuck et al)
- makes it clear that attendance is preferred (Ray)
- removes no existing rights (Stephane)
- allows for equivalent flexibility for any proxy giving Councilor (Chuck)
- removes the objection to the legal basis for the proxy giver providing voting
direction (Ken).
- removes the odd absence/abstention confusion (Philip, Chuck, Avri).
 
Thoughts on the attached v3 ?
Ken, Rob any legal holes?
 
Philip