RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

When it involves a NomCom appointee.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Ron Andruff
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 12:01 PM
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6

 

To understand this better: The notification should, where applicable, be sent 
by the Proxy Giver's appointing organization.

 

Can someone explain where this is not applicable?

 

Thank you,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

 

RNA Partners, Inc.

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:27 AM
To: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6

 

 

According to the existing process the proxy notification should be sent by the 
Proxy Giver'S appointing organization (if applicable)

 

 

Kind regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----

Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von 
Philip Sheppard

Gesendet: Montag, 16. Mai 2011 12:04

An: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx

Betreff: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6

 

 

In view of the comments from Legal, I propose this new version of the rules.

I have highlighted in yellow changes (all additions) from v5.

 

Comments, expressions of support with a view to OSC adoption by May 26 please.

 

Philip

OSC Chair