Re: AW: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Wolf-Ulrich,

We will take care of getting it posted.  Will you be sending it to the
Council?  I think it needs to come from a Council member.

Thanks so much,
Julie


On 6/14/11 2:01 PM, "Wolf-Ulrich Knoben" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I agree to the draft motion.
> If both Julie and Glen could do the necessary job to get it posted I'd be
> happy. 
> 
> 
> Thanks and regards
> Wolf-Ulrich 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 17:23
> An: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
> Cc: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL
> 
> Philip and Wolf-Ulrich,
> 
> Here is a draft motion for your consideration.  Attached also is the
> recommendations document in the form for including as a PDF link (the only
> changes are a header and a title that is more precise).  The terminology
> "<INSERT LINK>" in the motion will be replaced with the actual link as soon
> as Glen can get it posted.
> 
> I welcome your suggested changes to improve the motion.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Julie 
> 
> 
> On 6/14/11 10:50 AM, "philip.sheppard@xxxxxx" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> Fine for me
>> 
>>> Dear Wolf-Ulrich and Philip,
>>> 
>>> These are important considerations.  There will indeed be quite a bit of
>>> work to include the revised procedures in the appropriate places of the
>>> GNSO
>>> Council Operating Procedures and to ensure that all possible related areas
>>> of the procedures are consistent with the recommended changes.  The voting
>>> flow chart also will need to be altered.
>>> 
>>> Moreover, it now occurs to me that any changes to the GNSO Council
>>> Operating
>>> Procedures must be submitted for public comment.  Perhaps we should
>>> consider
>>> having an interim motion at the 22 June meeting whereby the Council
>>> directs
>>> staff to prepare a redline version of the revised GNSO Council Operating
>>> Procedures and submit it for public comment for 30 days?
>>> 
>>> If you agree I would be happy to prepare such a motion for your
>>> consideration.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Julie
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 6/14/11 10:28 AM, "Wolf-Ulrich Knoben" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry, I was too fast thinking the council could easily approve the
>>>> amendments
>>>> with a motion at the Singapore meeting.
>>>> 
>>>> By checking the document provided it becomes clearer that a clean and
>>>> redline
>>>> version of the relevant parts of the ROPs are required in order to give
>>>> council members a chance to understand the rationale behind. I'd like to
>>>> ask
>>>> Julie whether you could prepare those versions as well as drafting a
>>>> related
>>>> motion. In addition staff may need time to adapt the "voting flow
>>>> chart".
>>>> 
>>>> Officially the document and motion deadline for the Singapore meeting is
>>>> today. I wonder if there's time enough to prepare. It may therefore be
>>>> more
>>>> useful to move to the next council meeting (21 July).
>>>> 
>>>> Secondly, I'd like to ask whether there are further items still on the
>>>> OSC
>>>> agenda. The OSC term - by a council motion - has been extended until the
>>>> Singapore meeting.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im
>>>> Auftrag von
>>>> Philip Sheppard
>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 15:13
>>>> An: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 -
>>>> FINAL
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Wolf-Ulrich - go for it !
>>>> Philip
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>