ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL

  • To: <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:01:42 +0200

I agree to the draft motion.
If both Julie and Glen could do the necessary job to get it posted I'd be 

Thanks and regards

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 17:23
An: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL

Philip and Wolf-Ulrich,

Here is a draft motion for your consideration.  Attached also is the
recommendations document in the form for including as a PDF link (the only
changes are a header and a title that is more precise).  The terminology
"<INSERT LINK>" in the motion will be replaced with the actual link as soon
as Glen can get it posted.

I welcome your suggested changes to improve the motion.

Best regards,


On 6/14/11 10:50 AM, "philip.sheppard@xxxxxx" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>

> Fine for me
>> Dear Wolf-Ulrich and Philip,
>> These are important considerations.  There will indeed be quite a bit of
>> work to include the revised procedures in the appropriate places of the
>> Council Operating Procedures and to ensure that all possible related areas
>> of the procedures are consistent with the recommended changes.  The voting
>> flow chart also will need to be altered.
>> Moreover, it now occurs to me that any changes to the GNSO Council
>> Operating
>> Procedures must be submitted for public comment.  Perhaps we should
>> consider
>> having an interim motion at the 22 June meeting whereby the Council
>> directs
>> staff to prepare a redline version of the revised GNSO Council Operating
>> Procedures and submit it for public comment for 30 days?
>> If you agree I would be happy to prepare such a motion for your
>> consideration.
>> Thanks,
>> Julie
>> On 6/14/11 10:28 AM, "Wolf-Ulrich Knoben" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Sorry, I was too fast thinking the council could easily approve the
>>> amendments
>>> with a motion at the Singapore meeting.
>>> By checking the document provided it becomes clearer that a clean and
>>> redline
>>> version of the relevant parts of the ROPs are required in order to give
>>> council members a chance to understand the rationale behind. I'd like to
>>> ask
>>> Julie whether you could prepare those versions as well as drafting a
>>> related
>>> motion. In addition staff may need time to adapt the "voting flow
>>> chart".
>>> Officially the document and motion deadline for the Singapore meeting is
>>> today. I wonder if there's time enough to prepare. It may therefore be
>>> more
>>> useful to move to the next council meeting (21 July).
>>> Secondly, I'd like to ask whether there are further items still on the
>>> OSC
>>> agenda. The OSC term - by a council motion - has been extended until the
>>> Singapore meeting.
>>> Kind regards
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im
>>> Auftrag von
>>> Philip Sheppard
>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 15:13
>>> An: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 -
>>> Wolf-Ulrich - go for it !
>>> Philip

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy