Re: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL
Philip and Wolf-Ulrich, Here is a draft motion for your consideration. Attached also is the recommendations document in the form for including as a PDF link (the only changes are a header and a title that is more precise). The terminology "<INSERT LINK>" in the motion will be replaced with the actual link as soon as Glen can get it posted. I welcome your suggested changes to improve the motion. Best regards, Julie On 6/14/11 10:50 AM, "philip.sheppard@xxxxxx" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> wrote: > Fine for me > >> Dear Wolf-Ulrich and Philip, >> >> These are important considerations. There will indeed be quite a bit of >> work to include the revised procedures in the appropriate places of the >> GNSO >> Council Operating Procedures and to ensure that all possible related areas >> of the procedures are consistent with the recommended changes. The voting >> flow chart also will need to be altered. >> >> Moreover, it now occurs to me that any changes to the GNSO Council >> Operating >> Procedures must be submitted for public comment. Perhaps we should >> consider >> having an interim motion at the 22 June meeting whereby the Council >> directs >> staff to prepare a redline version of the revised GNSO Council Operating >> Procedures and submit it for public comment for 30 days? >> >> If you agree I would be happy to prepare such a motion for your >> consideration. >> >> Thanks, >> Julie >> >> >> On 6/14/11 10:28 AM, "Wolf-Ulrich Knoben" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> Sorry, I was too fast thinking the council could easily approve the >>> amendments >>> with a motion at the Singapore meeting. >>> >>> By checking the document provided it becomes clearer that a clean and >>> redline >>> version of the relevant parts of the ROPs are required in order to give >>> council members a chance to understand the rationale behind. I'd like to >>> ask >>> Julie whether you could prepare those versions as well as drafting a >>> related >>> motion. In addition staff may need time to adapt the "voting flow >>> chart". >>> >>> Officially the document and motion deadline for the Singapore meeting is >>> today. I wonder if there's time enough to prepare. It may therefore be >>> more >>> useful to move to the next council meeting (21 July). >>> >>> Secondly, I'd like to ask whether there are further items still on the >>> OSC >>> agenda. The OSC term - by a council motion - has been extended until the >>> Singapore meeting. >>> >>> >>> Kind regards >>> Wolf-Ulrich >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im >>> Auftrag von >>> Philip Sheppard >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 15:13 >>> An: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx >>> Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - >>> FINAL >>> >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich - go for it ! >>> Philip >>> >>> >> >> > > Attachment:
Motion for Consideration - GNSO Council Operating Procedures - Proxy Voting.doc Attachment:
OSC Recommended Revisions to Proxy Voting Procedures Submitted to GNSO Council 14 June 2011.pdf
|