Re: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'd already asked staff to draft a motion so that I could make one today. I'd 
much rather you made it though Wolf.

If that can be done today, I think that would be great.

Stéphane



Le 14 juin 2011 à 16:28, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> Sorry, I was too fast thinking the council could easily approve the 
> amendments with a motion at the Singapore meeting.
> 
> By checking the document provided it becomes clearer that a clean and redline 
> version of the relevant parts of the ROPs are required in order to give 
> council members a chance to understand the rationale behind. I'd like to ask 
> Julie whether you could prepare those versions as well as drafting a related 
> motion. In addition staff may need time to adapt the "voting flow chart".
> 
> Officially the document and motion deadline for the Singapore meeting is 
> today. I wonder if there's time enough to prepare. It may therefore be more 
> useful to move to the next council meeting (21 July).
> 
> Secondly, I'd like to ask whether there are further items still on the OSC 
> agenda. The OSC term - by a council motion - has been extended until the 
> Singapore meeting.
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> Wolf-Ulrich 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag 
> von Philip Sheppard
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 15:13
> An: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL
> 
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich - go for it !
> Philip
> 
>