<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL
- To: <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:03:21 +0200
Stéphane,
I think you're right that this should formally be approved with a council
motion. If you and Philip agree I'm prepared to draft one in order to keep the
deadline
Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von
Stéphane Van Gelder
Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. Juni 2011 22:57
An: Philip Sheppard
Cc: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v7 - FINAL
Philip,
Do you know if this be accompanied by a motion for our Singapore meeting?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 9 juin 2011 à 14:28, Philip Sheppard a écrit :
>
> Dear OSC members,
>
> since I circulated the attached v7 on May 16 there have been no proposed
> additions to our revised text on proxy votes.
>
> We have since seen comments from legal staff, noted them, discussed them on
> list
> , and agreed to make no further changes as the scenarios raised were all both
> cases best suited to being dealt with by the Constituency or the appointing
> body.
>
> For good order then I wish to inform the OSC that I will recommend the
> attached
> to Council on Tuesday June 14.
>
> Philip
> OSC Chair
> <proxy votes v7.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|