[gnso-pednr-dt] PEDNR workshop

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Alan for your feedback. As this meeting is likely to be the kick-off for 
the WG, would the following agenda make sense and address your points?


 *   The ALAC Request - issues identified and envisioned outcomes (Alan)
 *   The Issues Report - overview and recommendations (Marika)
 *   The role of compliance in the Expired Domain Name Deletion Policy - (ICANN 
compliance department - if available)
 *   Domain Name end-of-life cycle - theory and practice (Rob Hall - if 
available)
 *   Exchange of views on PEDNR Charter questions (All):

         - Whether adequate opportunity exists for registrants to redeem their 
expired domain names;
- Whether expiration-related provisions in typical registration agreements are 
clear and conspicuous enough;
         - Whether adequate notice exists to alert registrants of upcoming 
expirations;
          - Whether additional measures need to be implemented to indicate that 
once a domain name enters the Auto-Renew Grace Period, it has expired (e.g., 
hold status, a                                         notice on the site with 
a link to information on how to renew, or other options to be determined).
         - Whether to allow the transfer of a domain name during the RGP.

Best regards,

Marika


On 5/27/09 11:35 AM, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

At 27/05/2009 03:27 AM, Marika Konings wrote:

In addition to the development of a proposed charter, I am hoping to get your 
thoughts and ideas for the programme of the workshop on Post-Expiration Domain 
Name Recovery that has been scheduled for Wednesday 24 June from 14.00 - 16.00 
in Sydney (see http://syd.icann.org/node/3869) to allow for a first exchange of 
views with the broader community on these issues and hopefully attract 
additional people to join the Working Group.

Marika, thanks for starting this.

I think that two parts that are required are:

1. A tutorial on the end-of-life cycle both as originally imagined and what is 
actually happening.
2. A summary of what those who initiated this process imagine as reasonable 
outcomes.

I would be happy to participate in both parts (assuming a decision is made soon 
to give me time to prepare).

Part 1. could also be done by staff. Alternately, perhaps Rob hall could be 
convinced to present such a review. He did something similar in Lisbon - 
http://www.icann.org/en/meetings/lisbon/transcript-tutorial-expiring-25mar07.htm
 .

Alan