RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Proposed agenda for PEDNR WG call

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Marika.

Before we dive too deeply into questions about resellers, I'd encourage
folks to review the new Registrar Accreditation Agreement (adopted early
by many major registrars).  Specifically, it contains provisions
addressing the relationship between registrars and resellers, beginning
with the new language in Sec. 3.12.

http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/agreements.html

With this in mind, I would propose that we make no distinction between
"resellers" and "registrars" for the purposes of this PDP.

Thanks--

J.


   -------- Original Message --------
 Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Proposed agenda for PEDNR WG call
 From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Tue, August 18, 2009 2:37 am
 To: "gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
 
 Proposed agenda for PEDNR WG call Dear All,
 
 Please find below the proposed agenda for today’s PEDNR WG call. For
further details, please see the WG wiki at
https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/.
 
 With best regards,
 
 Marika
 
 Proposed Agenda
 
 
+ Roll-call 
+ Finalization of PEDNR public comment announcement 
+ Review of constituency input template 
+ Continue discussion on registrar survey – which information is
required to answer charter questions? 
+ Discussion of example of a ‘so-called reseller that is likely a
Registrar’ provided by Garth Bruen 
+ Schedule for next and further meetings