<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-pednr-dt] Re: Audit finding: Many registrars fail to post fee information on their website for recovering domain names in RGP; Advisory to registrars to be posted shortly
- To: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Re: Audit finding: Many registrars fail to post fee information on their website for recovering domain names in RGP; Advisory to registrars to be posted shortly
- From: William McKelligott <William.McKelligott@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:37:38 -0700
Hi, Jeff
As you know, the EDDP revises the domain registration expiration provisions in
ICANN's RAA.
3.7.5.6 "If Registrar operates a website for domain registration or renewal, it
should state, both at the time of registration and in a clear place on its
website, any fee charged for the recovery of a domain name during the
Redemption Grace Period."
You are right- the new RAA contains section 3.7.5.6 whereas the old one does
not. The EDDP, a consensus policy, was posted by the Board on 21 September
2004 and started to take effect on 21 December 2004- several years after the
RAA version 2001 was adopted. This and other consensus policies apply to
registrars under the old RAA (I believe this is covered in section 4.1.1 of the
old RAA).
Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
William
On 9/1/09 1:04 PM, "Jeff Eckhaus" <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
William,
I do have a question regarding the claim that Many registrars fail to post fee
(over 500). The section that you refer to 3.7.5.6 of the RAA refers to the new
RAA and the new requirement to post the RGP fee.
I assume that the audit you completed only researched Registrars that signed
the new RAA. Can you please confirm to the group.
Thanks
Jeff
From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of William McKelligott
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 9:47 AM
To: gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Stacy Burnette; David Giza
Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Audit finding: Many registrars fail to post fee
information on their website for recovering domain names in RGP; Advisory to
registrars to be posted shortly
Importance: High
Members of the PEDNR WG,
ICANN Compliance recently completed an audit of all registrar websites to
establish if they were compliant with the Expired Domain Deletion Policy as it
relates to fees charged to registered name holders for recovering domain names
that have entered the Redemption Grace Period (RGP) (please refer to section
3.7.5.6 of the EDDP). A large number or registrars- close to 500 of them-
posted information on their websites in relation to recovering domain names
that are in RGP which either either did not mention fees or mentioned them but
did not specify any amount (e.g., "fees will apply").
The EDDP requires registrars to post on their website the actual fees charged
to registered name holders for recovering domain names that are in RGP.
Compliance will be posting an advisory and reaching out to registrars in the
very near future to clarify this requirement.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
William A. McKelligott
Auditor, Contractual Compliance Team
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
1875 I (Eye) Street, NW, Suite 501 Washington, DC 20006 United States of
America
P (202) 429-2709
F (202) 429-2714
M (310) 409-9763
william.mckelligott@xxxxxxxxx
Did you know? ICANN is responsible for the global coordination of the
Internet's system of unique identifiers. These include domain names (like .com,
.uk, and .jobs), as well as the addresses used in a variety of Internet
protocols. Computers use these identifiers to reach each other over the
Internet. Learn more at http://icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|