<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] PEDNR WG Survey Results Reorganized
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] PEDNR WG Survey Results Reorganized
- From: Sivasubramanian Muthusamy <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:57:19 +0530
My comments are removed in this 'reorganized' document. Is this for
convenience? And does this 'reorganized' document replace the survey results
as originally compiled?
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> In order to facilitate the review of the responses to the PEDNR WG survey
> on today’s call, I have created the attached document which aims to group
> together the responses based on the level of agreement. In this way, the
> group could first focus on those issues where there seems to be broad
> support for one approach over another and leave those where there are very
> different views until the end. I have also taken the liberty to highlight
> some of the responses qualified as ‘other’ where the respondent seems to
> provide a clear yes or no, so that the group can take that into account when
> reviewing the question.
>
> Again, this is just a tool to facilitate the review and discussion of the
> results of the survey and it is up to the WG whether you want to use it or
> not. If there are any other suggestions, please feel free to share those
> with the list.
>
> With best regards,
>
> Marika
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|